Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, Court-appointed Monitor, Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff") 1 , by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Jacobs L. Fonnesbeck of Smith Correll,
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, Court-appointed Monitor, Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff") 1 , by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Jacobs L. Fonnesbeck of Smith Correll, L..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Court-appointed Monitor, Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff")1, by and through his counsel, Michael F. Lynch of the Lynch Law Practice, PLLC and Edward Chang and Logan Smith of McNamara Smith LLP and Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Jacobs L. Fonnesbeck of Smith Correll, LLP and Sharon L. McCarthy, Christopher M. Ferguson, and Cassandra Vogel of Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP, hereby stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") was filed on February 9, 2018 (ECF No. 22);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff's deadline to file his response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently February 23, 2018;
WHEREAS, the parties stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Plaintiff's deadline to file his response to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended by three weeks, to March 16, 2018;
WHEREAS, the parties also stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Defendants' deadline to file their reply shall be extended by two weeks, to April 6, 2018; and
WHEREAS, this is the first stipulation for extension of time to file Plaintiff's response and Defendants' reply to the Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
