Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHAPMAN v. AJMER-KULDIP BHOGAL, INC., 1:15-cv-01328-JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161104b33 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER THEREON (Doc. 33) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorn
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER THEREON

(Doc. 33)

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2).

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document.

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation which relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2), the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

The Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer