Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burgess v. Shadday, 2:15-cv-1582 CKD P. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160316855 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . On February 8, 2016 defendant Shadday filed a motion to dismiss this action, arguing that plaintiff's claims are time-barred, among other arguments. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action
More

ORDER

On February 8, 2016 defendant Shadday filed a motion to dismiss this action, arguing that plaintiff's claims are time-barred, among other arguments. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer