Harper v. City of Merced, 1:18-cv-00562-LJO-SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180503d97
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 3) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Darcy Harper, filed a complaint on April 25, 2018 (Doc. 1), an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 on April 26, 2018 (Doc. 3). 1 Plaintiff's application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of C
Summary: ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 3) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Darcy Harper, filed a complaint on April 25, 2018 (Doc. 1), an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 on April 26, 2018 (Doc. 3). 1 Plaintiff's application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Co..
More
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(Doc. 3)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Darcy Harper, filed a complaint on April 25, 2018 (Doc. 1), an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on April 26, 2018 (Doc. 3).1 Plaintiff's application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue a summons; and
3. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon the defendant as directed by the plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis on April 25, 2018, but the application was erroneously noticed for hearing before the wrong magistrate judge. (See Doc. 2.) Because the Court grants Plaintiff's correctly-noticed application for in forma pauperis filed the next day, Plaintiff's earlier-filed application (Doc. 2) is DENIED as MOOT.
Source: Leagle
