MAHAN v. PEREZ, 3:16-cv-02024-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161011856
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS: (1) Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez's reply brief is currently due on October 10, 2016; (2) On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez's counsel learned that the primary associate on this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS: (1) Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez's reply brief is currently due on October 10, 2016; (2) On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez's counsel learned that the primary associate on this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this m..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
STIPULATION
WHEREAS:
(1) Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez's reply brief is currently due on October 10, 2016;
(2) On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez's counsel learned that the primary associate on this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this matter, or any other matter, for an indeterminate amount of time;
(3) After learning of this medical emergency, Mr. Perez's counsel immediately contacted Mr. Mahan and asked for an extension of time of four days, from October 10, 2016 until October 14, 2016, to file his reply brief;
(4) Mr. Mahan agreed to Mr. Perez's requested extension;
(5) The agreed-upon extension will not have any effect on the scheduling of the hearing on the motion, which is scheduled for November 3, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant Juan Perez's Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss shall be due on October 14, 2016.
PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION
I, Brian Hauck, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory Chauncey Mahan.
Source: Leagle
