Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Garcia v. PPG Industries, Inc., C 15-00319 WHO. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160317a32 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Garcia et al. and Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, to the following: 1. WHEREAS Plaintiffs have just finalized the settle
More

STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Garcia et al. and Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, to the following:

1. WHEREAS Plaintiffs have just finalized the settlement agreement in this case as of March 10, 2015;

2. WHEREAS Plaintiffs have filed herewith an Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Approval of FLSA Settlement;

3. WHEREAS Defendant does not anticipate filing any responsive brief prior to the hearing on the motion;

4. WHEREAS under the Local Rules, motions are heard on a 35-day calendar unless the briefing schedule is modified by the Court;

5. WHEREAS the parties wish to proceed with the settlement Notice process as expeditiously as possible;

6. WHEREAS the Court has scheduled a status hearing in this case for March 22, 2016 (ECF No. 34);

7. NOW THEREFORE the Parties stipulate and request the Court to order as follows:

8. The hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall take place at the currently scheduled status hearing on March 22, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable William H. Orrick, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. The filing of the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall satisfy the parties' obligation to file a Status Report as ordered in Docket No. 34.

It is so stipulated.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Northern District L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: March 11, 2016 /s/ William C. Jhaveri-Weeks William C. Jhaveri-Weeks GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer