Lucero v. AIDS Healthcare Foundation, 2:18-cv-09418-FMO-AFM. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190508a49
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION [31] TO REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT TO STATE COURT FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Before the Court, the parties' stipulation that the above-entitled matter be remanded to the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court Orders as follows: 1. Due to the dismissal filed by former plaintiff Virtnand Mullen, the United States District Court no longer pos
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION [31] TO REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT TO STATE COURT FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: Before the Court, the parties' stipulation that the above-entitled matter be remanded to the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court Orders as follows: 1. Due to the dismissal filed by former plaintiff Virtnand Mullen, the United States District Court no longer poss..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION [31] TO REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT TO STATE COURT
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
Before the Court, the parties' stipulation that the above-entitled matter be remanded to the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court Orders as follows:
1. Due to the dismissal filed by former plaintiff Virtnand Mullen, the United States District Court no longer possesses jurisdiction over this case.
2. The above-entitled matter be remanded to the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County.
3. Each party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent removal of the action pursuant to this Stipulation and Order.
4. All pending deadlines and hearings in this case should be taken off the Court's calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
