Filed: Nov. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Jones prevails on his RLUIPA Complaint against Defendants with respect to his request
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Jones prevails on his RLUIPA Complaint against Defendants with respect to his request ..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff Jones prevails on his RLUIPA Complaint against Defendants with respect to his request for a religious exemption to the ADC grooming policy, and is entitled to wear a one-fourth inch beard.
2. Plaintiff's request to amend his injunctive relief is DENIED. Document #58.
3. Plaintiff's request for expungement of his disciplinary history is DENIED.
4. Plaintiff's Motion to file a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Document #117.
5. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED as moot. Document #118.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
