Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sinsioco v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, 3:18-cv-02738 (EMC). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180725907 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Henry Sinsioco and Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC hereby file this Stipulation Modifying the Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. The parties have conferred and state the following: WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, Defendant moved to dismiss the Complain
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Henry Sinsioco and Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC hereby file this Stipulation Modifying the Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. The parties have conferred and state the following:

WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, Defendant moved to dismiss the Complaint, see Dkt. No. 20;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint currently is due on or before July 26, 2018;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(b), any reply in support of Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint currently must be filed on or before August 2, 2018;

WHEREAS, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint is noticed for a hearing on September 27, 2018, see Dkt. No. 20;

WHEREAS, the parties' Initial Case Management Conference with this Court also is scheduled for September 27, 2018, see Dkt. No. 24;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to oppose the motion to dismiss or to file an amended complaint so that either would be due thirty (30) days after the filing of Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendant has requested an extension of time to file any reply in support of the motion to dismiss or to respond to an amended complaint so that either would be due thirty (30) days after the filing of Plaintiff's opposition to the motion to dismiss or amended complaint;

WHEREAS, these extensions are warranted for the reasons set forth in the Declaration of Michael L. Kidney, which is filed in support of this stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a);

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT, subject to the Court's approval:

Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint or an amended complaint on or before August 13, 2018; and

Defendant shall file any reply in support of the motion to dismiss the Complaint or respond to an amended complaint on or before September 12, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer