Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ojmar U.S., LLC v. Security People, Inc., 16-4948-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161114l78 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC ("Ojmar") and Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay (herein referred collectively as "SPI") by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Ojmar filed its First Amended Complaint for Antitrust Violations, Unfair Competition, and Related Claims
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC ("Ojmar") and Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay (herein referred collectively as "SPI") by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Ojmar filed its First Amended Complaint for Antitrust Violations, Unfair Competition, and Related Claims ("First Amended Complaint");

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2016, SPI filed Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC's First Amended Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"), which is set for hearing on December 29, 2016 (ECF No. 21);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3, Ojmar has until November 14, 2016 to file a brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and SPI has until November 21, 2016 to file reply brief to Ojmar's brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, Ojmar requested of SPI an extension of time until November 28, 2016 to have reasonable time to consider and file a brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, SPI requested of Ojmar until December 12, 2016 to file a reply brief to Ojmar's brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the extended briefing schedule will not disturb the current December 29, 2016 hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, Ojmar and SPI agree to the extensions; and

WHEREAS, the extension will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

ACCORDINGLY, with the Court's permission, the parties agree that the remaining briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss should be changed to:

November 28, 2016: deadline for Ojmar to file a brief in opposition to Motion to Dismiss;

December 12, 2016: deadline for SPI to file a reply brief to Ojmar' brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss;

December 29, 2016: Motion to Dismiss filed by SPI is currently noticed to be heard on this date.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

In compliance with Civil L.R. Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and (Proposed) Order.

ORDER

In accordance with a stipulation between the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the schedule in this case be amended as follows:

There being a showing of good cause based on the parties' stipulation, the briefing schedule regarding Defendants Security People, Inc. and Asil Gokcebay's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Ojmar U.S., LLC's First Amended Complaint is set forth below: 1) Ojmar's Opposition Brief is due on November 28, 2016; 2) SPI's Reply Brief is due on December 12, 2016; 3) A hearing shall be heard on December 29, 2016.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer