Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gbarabe v. Chevron Corporation, 14-cv-00173-SI. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160923865 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CURRENTLY SEY FOR AUGUST 5, 2016. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, the Court, on its own motion, continued plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Costs/Sanctions ( ECF 138 ) and defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Litigation Funding Documents ( ECF 139, both originally set for hearing on July 29, 2016 at 10.00 a.m., and further continued the Case Management Conference in this matter,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF MOTIONS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CURRENTLY SEY FOR AUGUST 5, 2016.

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, the Court, on its own motion, continued plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Costs/Sanctions (ECF 138) and defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Litigation Funding Documents (ECF 139, both originally set for hearing on July 29, 2016 at 10.00 a.m., and further continued the Case Management Conference in this matter, set for July 29, 2016 ay 3.00 p.m., all in Courtroom One of the above Court, until August 5, 2016 at the herein-mentioned times and place (Doc. No. 151);

WHEREAS, plaintiff's counsel immediately informed defense counsel of a conflict on the new date and requested the latter stipulate to August 12, 2016 for said proceedings, subject to Court approval;

WHEREAS, counsel for defendant, on July 25, 2016, informed plaintiff counsel that they would agree to the proposed date of August 12, 2016 but no other date further in the future;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, subject to the Court's approval, that the herein identified motions be continued for hearing on August 12, 2016, both at 10.00 a.m. in Courtroom One, and the Case Management Conference also be continued to said August 12, 2016 date at 3.00 p.m. in Courtroom One of this Court.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, NEIL J. FRASER, attest that concurrence in filing this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer