Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DIXON v. CITY OF OAKLAND, C12-5207 DMR. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130822844 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge. ALL PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE, AND REQUEST THIS COURT TO ORDER, THAT the settlement conference currently scheduled before Magistrate Judge Cousins for September 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. be rescheduled to December 17, 2013. The reason for this requested continuance is that, in the parties' estimation, the case is not in a settlement posture due to d
More

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

ALL PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE, AND REQUEST THIS COURT TO ORDER, THAT the settlement conference currently scheduled before Magistrate Judge Cousins for September 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. be rescheduled to December 17, 2013. The reason for this requested continuance is that, in the parties' estimation, the case is not in a settlement posture due to discovery that remains to be completed.

Plaintiff has not yet had an opportunity to depose the individual defendants in this matter. These depositions are currently scheduled to occur during early to mid-September. Additionally, Defendants have not yet deposed Plaintiff. The parties anticipate these depositions will be completed by December 2013 and that they will then be in a position to evaluate this case for settlement.

SO STIPULATED.

(PROPOSED) ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The settlement conference scheduled for September 12, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. is rescheduled for December 17, 2013 at ________________.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer