Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Davis v. Montgomery, 5:19-01171 MWF (ADS). (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200318933 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner's Opposition, and all related filings, along with the Report and Recommendation dated December 16, 2019 [Dkt. No. 14], of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objection to Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 15]. Further, the Court has engaged
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner's Opposition, and all related filings, along with the Report and Recommendation dated December 16, 2019 [Dkt. No. 14], of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objection to Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 15]. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 14] is accepted; 2. The Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Petition is dismissed with prejudice; and 3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer