Goldsmith, v. Aargon Collection Agency, Inc., 2:16-cv-02066-GMN-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180126j29
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 108) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to engage in mediation and set depositions for certain dates. Docket No. 108. Parties do not need Court approval to engage in mediation or to set deposition dates. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 29. Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED as unnecessary. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. To the extent the parties are implicitly seeking some unspecified relief ( e.g., staying discovery
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 108) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to engage in mediation and set depositions for certain dates. Docket No. 108. Parties do not need Court approval to engage in mediation or to set deposition dates. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 29. Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED as unnecessary. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. To the extent the parties are implicitly seeking some unspecified relief ( e.g., staying discovery p..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 108)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a stipulation to engage in mediation and set depositions for certain dates. Docket No. 108. Parties do not need Court approval to engage in mediation or to set deposition dates. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 29. Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED as unnecessary.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. To the extent the parties are implicitly seeking some unspecified relief (e.g., staying discovery pending mediation or extending deadlines set by the Court), the Court declines to guess as to what relief is actually being sought and expresses no opinion herein on such issues.
Source: Leagle
