Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

T.R.P. Company, Inc. v. Similasan AG, 2:17-cv-02197-JCM-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190405f31 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is defendant Similasan Corporation's motion to seal (ECF No. 85), filed on February 4, 2019. Also before the court is plaintiff T.R.P. Company's motion for leave to file portions of its opposition under seal (ECF No. 89), filed on February 19, 2019. Also before the court is defendant Similasan Corporation's motion for leave to file portions of its reply under seal (ECF No. 91), filed on February 26, 2019. The aforementi
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is defendant Similasan Corporation's motion to seal (ECF No. 85), filed on February 4, 2019. Also before the court is plaintiff T.R.P. Company's motion for leave to file portions of its opposition under seal (ECF No. 89), filed on February 19, 2019. Also before the court is defendant Similasan Corporation's motion for leave to file portions of its reply under seal (ECF No. 91), filed on February 26, 2019. The aforementioned motions are unopposed.

Defendant moves to filed under seal portions of its motion to compel (ECF No. 86) and its reply to the motion to the motion to compel (ECF No. 92).1 Plaintiff moves to seal its response (ECF No. 88) to the defendant's motion to compel.2 Given that the motions are unopposed, the court will grant the motions to seal.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED defendant's motions to seal (ECF Nos. 85, 89) are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to seal (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED.

FootNotes


1. The motion to compel and reply are filed under seal are filed under seal at ECF Nos. 87 and 93.
2. The response is filed under seal at ECF No. 90.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer