Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Millan, 14-cr-160 GEB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141121a80 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JOSH SIGAL, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS, attorney for JOSE MILLAN, and CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, attorney for MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ that the status conference hearing date of November 21, 2014 be vacated, and the matter be set for status con
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JOSH SIGAL, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS, attorney for JOSE MILLAN, and CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, attorney for MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ that the status conference hearing date of November 21, 2014 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on December 12, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

The reasons for this continuance are to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including December 12, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Dated: November 19, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, /s/ Douglas J. Beevers for Josh Sigal JOSH SIGAL Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the November 21, 2014, status conference hearing be continued to December 12, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing there from, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the December 12, 2014 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer