Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hernandez, 2:09-cr-140 MCE. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160909n11 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE. MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Defendant, CARLOS HERNANDEZ, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE.

Defendant, CARLOS HERNANDEZ, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

2. On March 22, 2010, this Court sentenced Mr. Hernandez to a term of 204 months imprisonment;

3. His total offense level was 35, his criminal history category was I, and the resulting guideline range was 168 to 210 months. He received a sentence of 204 months pursuant to the parties' plea agreement, entered into under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C);

4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Hernandez was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44,973;

5. Mr. Hernandez' total offense level has been reduced from 35 to 33, and his amended guideline range is 135 to 168 months. A comparable point within the new range produces a term of 162 months imprisonment;

6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Hernandez' term of imprisonment to a term of 162 months.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Hernandez is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 35 to 33, resulting in an amended guideline range of 135 to 168 months.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in March 2010 be reduced to a term of 162 months.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Hernandez shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer