Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC v. Point-It!, Inc., 2:19-CV-00154. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190513d69
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: May 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint. Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019 and the deadline was previously extended by thirty days to give Defendant an opportunity to investigate Plaintiff's claims. Plaintif
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint. Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019 and the deadline was previously extended by thirty days to give Defendant an opportunity to investigate Plaintiff's claims. Plaintiff..
More
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
The Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby file this stipulated motion seeking an extension of the deadline for Defendant to Answer the Complaint.
Plaintiff served Defendant with an amended complaint for patent infringement on March 20, 2019 and the deadline was previously extended by thirty days to give Defendant an opportunity to investigate Plaintiff's claims. Plaintiff is currently negotiating a settlement with a non-party that would include an agreement to dismiss this case. Although Plaintiff and the non-party have made significant progress, additional time is required to finalize an agreement. The Parties therefore seek an extension of three additional weeks to allow for further negotiations.
The Parties therefore respectfully request that the Answer deadline be extended from May 8, 2019 to May 29, 2019, in accordance with the proposed order submitted below.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants have until May 29, 2019, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
Source: Leagle
