Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Flint Water Cases, 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20191119a61 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2019
Summary: SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . This Case Management Order (CMO) shall not apply to those defendants who have not filed an answer, except as otherwise provided by Court order. Any defendant to which this order does not apply shall be treated as a non-party for the purposes of discovery, subject to the defendant's properly raised objection. Non-parties who have been previously identified as defendants shall be entitled to participate in discovery initi
More

SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

This Case Management Order (CMO) shall not apply to those defendants who have not filed an answer, except as otherwise provided by Court order. Any defendant to which this order does not apply shall be treated as a non-party for the purposes of discovery, subject to the defendant's properly raised objection. Non-parties who have been previously identified as defendants shall be entitled to participate in discovery initiated by other parties. If and when any such defendants file an answer, such defendants shall be entitled to initiate discovery, the timing and manner of which shall then be established by this Court.

Contents I. Discovery Coordination Protocol 3 A. Scope 3 B. Definitions 5 C. Depositions 7 D. Other Coordination Obligations 11 II. Preliminary Discovery 14 A. Documents-Only Subpoenas to Non-Parties 14 B. Exchange of Freedom of Information Act Materials 21 III. Written Discovery 23 A. Privilege Logs 23 B. Requests for Documents and Tangible Things 25 C. Interrogatories 27 D. Requests for Admission 29 E. Pending Criminal Charges 30 IV. Requests for Entry on, Inspection, Sampling, and Testing of Land 30 V. Fact Witness Depositions 32 A. Testimonial Depositions 32 B. Depositions of Health Care Providers, and Education and Plumbing Professionals 34 C. Pending Criminal Charges 35 D. Deposition Protocol Order 35 VI. Plaintiff Examinations 54 VII. Expert Witnesses 54 VIII. Class Certification in Carthan 56 IX. Notices of Non-Parties at Fault in the Individual Actions 56 X. Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases 57 A. First Bellwether Pool Selection 57 B. Second Bellwether Pool Selection and Written Discovery 59 C. Third Bellwether Pool Selection and Further Discovery 61 D. Expert Depositions 62 E. Bellwether Trial Selection 64 XI. Discovery Dispute Protocol 64 XII. Pre-Trial Motions and Completion Date for Discovery in All Cases 66 XIII. Definitions 66 XIV. Appendices 68

I. Discovery Coordination Protocol

A. Scope

(1) The purpose of this Order is to effectuate efficiency and limit duplication in the discovery processes associated with litigation arising out of claims made regarding the use of the Flint River as a water source. Section I (Discovery Coordination Protocol) was adapted from the Amended Discovery Coordination Protocol Order (ECF No. 675) and now supersedes that order.

(2) This Order is not intended to serve as an instrument to circumvent each Judge's authority over his or her own docket, but rather as an instrument that allows for notice, attendance, and participation, if appropriate, in the discovery processes in the various venues wherein litigation involving the same or similar parties are pending in actions arising out of the same or similar events.

(3) This Order shall apply to all cases, currently or in the future, consolidated or coordinated into the Flint Water Cases before the Honorable Judith E. Levy. In that regard, it applies to all discovery permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including, without limitation: (i) depositions noticed under Rule 30; (ii) document requests and requests to inspect and/or permit entry onto property issued under Rule 34; (iii) subpoenas duces tecum issued under Rule 45 (iv) interrogatories under Rule 33; (v) motions for physical and mental examination under Rule 35; and (vi) requests for admission under Rule 36.

(4) The Court recognizes that effective coordination will require the approval and cooperation of the judges in the various state and federal cases that are not consolidated in the current case (5:16-cv-10444), including the entry of a complementary order(s) sufficient to accomplish that coordination in those other cases.1

B. Definitions

(1) "Federal Flint Water Cases" means all cases that are, currently or in the future, consolidated or coordinated into the above captioned case; and, subject to the entry of necessary complementary order(s): (i) Burgess, et al. v. United States, Case No. 17-11218, and Thomas, et al. v. United States, Case No. 18-10243, currently pending before the Hon. Linda V. Parker2 and (ii) any other federal court cases for which the Court determines that discovery coordination would be in the interest of justice.

(2) "State Flint Water Cases" means, subject to the entry of any necessary complementary order(s), all cases that are, currently or in the future, consolidated or coordinated into: (i) the In re Flint Water Litigation, Case No. 17-108646-NQ, in the Circuit Court of Genesee County, Michigan, (ii) the several legionella related cases recently transferred from Judge Fullerton to Judge Yuille in Genesee County; No. 17-11218, and Thomas, et al. v. United States, Case No. 18-1024, shall have the right to object to the entry of a complementary order in those cases. (iii) Tamara Nappier et al. v. Snyder et. al., Case No. 16-71 in the Michigan Court of Claims; and (iv) any other state court cases for which the Court determines that discovery coordination would be in the interest of justice.3

(3) "Flint Water Cases" means the Federal Flint Water Cases and the State Flint Water Cases, collectively. "CACC" means the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint pending in Carthan v. Snyder, 16-cv-10444.

(4) "Putative Class Action Plaintiffs" means: (i) the named Plaintiffs identified in the pending CACC and any subsequent Federal Flint Water case brought as a putative class action; and (ii) the named Plaintiffs identified in any currently pending class actions or later filed class actions in the State Flint Water Cases brought as a putative class action.

(5) "Individual Plaintiffs" means each Plaintiff who: (i) has filed or in the future files a "Short-Form Complaint" adopting the Master Long Form Complaint in either the Federal or State Court Flint Water Cases; or (ii) otherwise files a non-class complaint in either the Federal or State Court Flint Water Cases.

C. Depositions

(1) Subject to Section I(C)(2) below, a witness may be deposed only once in the Flint Water Cases after the date of this order, except by order of the Court based on a showing of good cause or by agreement of all interested parties. For purposes of this order, good cause includes, without limitation, a party's not having had a meaningful opportunity to depose a witness because that witness's deposition was taken before resolution of that party's dispositive motion(s) in a Flint Water Case, or any other circumstance in which a party has not had a meaningful opportunity to depose a witness. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a party may depose as a fact witness under Rule 30(b)(1) or Rule 45, or the comparable state court procedural rule if the deposition is noticed in a state court proceeding, an individual who has been previously deposed or will be deposed solely as an entity's designee under Rule 30(b)(6) or the comparable state court procedural rule; but in such case the individual may be deposed only once in his or her capacity as a designee and only once in his or her individual capacity. Nothing in this order shall be to the prejudice of any party's or witness's right to seek the protection of any court of competent jurisdiction from a deposition which the party or witness considers to be objectionable under the applicable law.

(2) Depositions that are noticed in the Federal Flint Water Cases shall be noticed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a proposed date, time, and location, subject to the provisions of this Order. (see also Section V(D) (Deposition Protocol)). Depositions that are noticed in the State Flint Water Cases shall be noticed pursuant to the Michigan Court Rules for a proposed date, time, and location, subject to the provisions of this Order.

(3) Prior Depositions.

(a) To the extent counsel for parties to Flint Water Cases have participated before the date of this order in depositions taken in any case included within the definition of Federal Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(1)), or in any case included within the definition of State Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(2)), or in any other case arising out of contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply, such counsel shall, within 14 days after the date of this order, file with this Court a list that sets forth: (i) the full caption of each case in which he or she has participated in such depositions, (ii) the name of each person or entity deposed in each such action, (iii) the name of the party and attorney who noticed each such deposition, (iv) the date(s) on which the deposition was taken, (v) all means by which the deposition was recorded, whether stenographically, audiovisually, or otherwise, and (vi) whether any testimony taken or exhibits marked at the deposition are subject to the terms of any confidentiality or other protective order entered in the case in which the deposition was taken.

(b) To the extent counsel for parties to Flint Water Cases have participated before the date of this order in depositions taken in any case included within the definition of Federal Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(1)), or in any case included within the definition of State Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(2)), or in any other case arising out of contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply, such counsel shall supply complete and accurate copies of the transcripts, videotapes, and other recordings of, and the exhibits to, all such depositions to all counsel of record in Flint Water Cases to the extent such counsel of record request the transcripts, videotapes, other recordings, and exhibits in writing and agree to reimburse counsel providing them for the reasonable actual cost of providing the copies. Such transcripts, videotapes, other recordings, and exhibits shall be delivered to the attorney requesting them within 7 calendar days after the request for them and agreement to reimburse is made. Provided, however, that this subsection shall not require delivery of transcripts, videotapes, or exhibits to the extent delivery in accordance with this subsection would contravene a confidentiality order or other protective order entered by the court with jurisdiction over the case in which the deposition was taken.

(c) To the extent counsel for parties to Flint Water Cases have noticed, or have received notice of, depositions to be taken but not yet taken in any case included within the definition of Federal Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(1)), or in any case included within the definition of State Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(2)) or in any other case arising out of contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply, such counsel shall forthwith file with this Court a list that sets forth: (i) the full caption of each case in which such deposition has been noticed, (ii) the name of each deponent named in each such notice, (iii) the name, telephone number, and e-mail address of the attorneys who have noticed each such deposition, (iv) and the date(s) for which the deposition has been noticed or will be taken.

D. Other Coordination Obligations

(1) All parties to the Federal Flint Water Cases shall endeavor to avoid service of discovery in any Flint Water Case that is duplicative of discovery already served after the date of this order in another Flint Water Case.

(2) Each party to the Federal Flint Water Cases shall use best efforts to be familiar with the documents and tangible things that have been produced and the written responses that have been made in response to earlier discovery requests in the Flint Water Cases so as to avoid unnecessary service of requests for documents and things that have already been produced in response to discovery requests in a Flint Water Case or to propound interrogatories to which complete and responsive answers have already been served in a Flint Water Case. Provided, however, that nothing in this Order impairs the right of any party to a Flint Water Case to serve requests for supplementation of prior discovery responses if the procedural rules of the court in which the requests for supplementation are served provide for such requests.

(3) Registration of Counsel. All counsel in the Flint Water Cases who have not already filed an appearance in E.D. Mich. Case No. 16-10444 are required to file an appearance as an interested party in that case. Any obligation for service and/or notice for matters covered by this Order shall be satisfied if filed in and served on all counsel listed in 16-10444 (see ECF No. 312, PageID.11658-11659 for instructions on how to file an appearance as an interested party).

(4) Service by Email. All parties shall be deemed to consent to service of any discovery document by email.

(5) Prior Interrogatories and Document Requests

(a) To the extent counsel for parties to Flint Water Cases have issued, before the date of this Order, interrogatories or document discovery (whether of parties or non-parties) (hereinafter "written discovery") in any case included within the definition of Federal Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(1)) or in any case included within the definition of State Flint Water Cases (see Section I(B)(2)) or in any other case arising out of contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply, such counsel shall, within 14 days after the date of this order, file with this Court a list that sets forth: (a) the full caption of each case in which the written discovery was issued, (b) the person or party to whom the written discovery was issued; (c) the title(s) and date of the written discovery; (c) whether responses to the written discovery were produced or served; (d) the responses are subject to the terms of any confidentiality or other protective order.

(b) With reference to the written discovery disclosed, counsel for the issuing party shall supply complete and accurate copies of the written discovery responses, including any documents, to the extent that counsel for any other party request them in writing and agree to reimburse counsel providing them for the reasonable actual cost of providing the copies. Such written discovery responses shall be delivered to the attorney requesting them within 7 calendar days after the request for them and agreement to reimburse is made. Provided, however, that this subsection shall not require delivery of written discovery responses to the extent delivery in accordance with this subsection would contravene a confidentiality order or other protective order entered by the court with jurisdiction over the case in which the written discovery was issued.

II. Preliminary Discovery

A. Documents-Only Subpoenas to Non-Parties

(1) This CMO applies to subpoenas issued in the Flint Water Cases to non-parties who are commanded by the subpoena to produce documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things but who are not commanded by the subpoena to provide testimony. This CMO supplements, but does not replace, the provisions addressing the same subject matter set forth in the Court's Order Regarding Matters Discussed at the April 16, 2018 Status Conference. (ECF No. 452.) This order shall remain effective except as modified by further court order or by stipulations entered on the docket in Case No. 16-cv-10444.

(2) Interim Lead Counsel for the Putative Class, Co-Liaison Counsel, and/or any defendant may cause a subpoena to be properly served on a non-party in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 or with the non-party's agreement to accept service by other means. Once an attorney drafts a non-party documents-only subpoena, he or she shall share the draft with counsel for the parties to the litigation as defined by the Case Management Order, or its then current iteration, who shall then have five business days to provide constructive comments, as well as to propose additional categories of documents, which proposals shall be shared with all counsel upon whom the draft was served. With regard to subpoenas proposed and not served prior to entry of this order, the foregoing five business day period shall commence upon issuance of this order. The subpoena's originator may incorporate the proposed changes to the draft subpoena. After five business days have passed, the subpoena's originator may serve the subpoena in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or pursuant to an agreement with the non-party to accept service (the "Initial Subpoena"), and shall deliver a copy of such issued subpoena to all parties of record. Within 5 business days of the service of the Initial Subpoena, counsel for the remaining parties to the litigation may serve a supplemental subpoena on the same non-party requesting additional categories of documents not included in the original subpoena ("Supplemental Subpoena") and shall deliver a copy of such issued subpoena to all parties of record. The lawyer serving the Initial Subpoena shall at the time of such service advise the non-party that Supplemental Subpoenas may be served by the other parties to the litigation within 5 business days and that the non-party should produce the documents requested by all subpoenas in a contemporaneous production, provided that the production required by the Initial Subpoena and each Supplemental Subpoena shall be made upon counsel for each such requesting party, or that counsel's document or copy service provider.

(3) Prior to service of the Initial Subpoena, any party to the litigation may choose to be a co-signatory of the Initial Subpoena by advising the originator of that intent, and once so advised, the originator shall include any such party as a co-signatory of the Initial Subpoena. After service of the Initial Subpoena, and after service of each Supplemental Subpoena, each party to the litigation shall advise the originator(s) if that party would like to receive copies of the documents produced by the non-party. Counsel that has proposed changes to an Initial or Supplemental Subpoena is not deemed to be a signatory, or to have requested copies, regardless of whether the proposed changes were adopted by the originator.

(4) Fifty percent of the costs associated with third party discovery shall be borne by plaintiffs and fifty percent of the costs associated with third party discovery shall be borne by defendants. As to how the defendants' costs shall be allocated, the following provisions shall apply to the costs associated with the initial and any supplemental subpoena:

(a) All defendants seeking discovery from a non-party shall contribute in equal shares to the costs associated with that discovery.

(b) If a defendant that did not initially request or seek the discovery later wants access to the information, that party shall then become responsible for an equal share of the cost. The party or parties that initially requested the discovery shall maintain records of the costs incurred and the initial division of costs among defendants. If an additional defendant joins in the request or seeks access to the discovery after the costs have been allocated among the initial defendants, the initial defendants shall reallocate the costs by including the new defendant and the new defendant shall reimburse the initial defendants. For example, if four defendants initially requested the discovery, each defendant shall pay 25% of the costs. If a fifth defendant later joins in the request, each defendant shall pay 20% of the costs and the new defendant shall reimburse each of the initial four defendants 5% of the costs. For the purposes of this process, a defendant shall mean an individual named person or entity.

(c) The initial parties shall not provide access to the discovery materials to a new party unless and until the new party pays the required amount. This allocation formula shall apply retroactively and prospectively to all such discovery costs incurred in the Flint Water Cases. Accordingly, parties that now seek to utilize discovery materials previously obtained by and at the expense of other parties must reimburse the "paying parties" in accordance with the formula above.

(d) Any disputes about these provisions may be brought to the Special Master or to the Court for resolution.

(5) The signatories may, but need not, agree (unanimously) to identify in the subpoena itself one or more of themselves as persons who the non-party recipient should contact with questions about the subpoena. Agreements to modify the non-party documents-only subpoena, including without limitation to enlarge the time for responding to it, to change the specified place or manner of production of materials requested by it, or to modify the scope or description of the requested materials, must be unanimous by the signatories of the subpoena. If unanimity cannot be achieved with reasonable promptness, any signatory may contact the Special Master to schedule a telephone hearing to resolve the dispute.

(6) If a non-party serves objections to a non-party documents-only subpoena or moves for a protective order with respect to the subpoena or to quash it, Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel may bring a motion on behalf of the plaintiffs named in the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint to compel compliance with all or part of the subpoena or may oppose in whole or in part the motion for a protective order or to quash; Plaintiffs' Co-Liaison Counsel may do likewise on behalf of the plaintiffs for whom they are counsel of record or at the request of any other individual plaintiff's counsel of record; and counsel of record for any answering parties may do likewise on their clients' behalf. If and only if Plaintiffs' Co-Liaison Counsel refuse to bring a motion to compel compliance at the request of an individual plaintiff's counsel of record, or to oppose at the request of such other counsel of record a non-party's motion for a protective order or to quash, may such other individual plaintiff's counsel of record bring such a motion or file such opposition.

(7) The attorney who receives a non-party's production in response to a documents-only subpoena shall without delay notify in writing Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel, Plaintiffs' Co-Liaison Counsel, and the lawyers representing the parties of his or her receipt of the production and shall thereafter provide copies of all or any parts of the production to the attorneys for parties to the Flint Water Cases who make written request and pay for them. Production to such other attorneys shall be in the same form and order as the materials were produced by the non-party unless otherwise agreed in writing and shall occur as soon as is reasonably feasible in light of the form and volume of the production. Transmission of the produced materials should be by the most economical means that is reasonably feasible, such as, for example, e-mail, FTP, or other electronic means. In addition to payment to the non-party for the cost of responding to the subpoena, each party that receives a copy of the production must promptly reimburse the attorney who provided it for the reasonable actual copying and transmission cost incurred by that attorney in supplying the copy of the production.

(8) Consistent with this Court's Order Preserving Certain Immunities and Defenses for Purposes of Limited Pre-Answer Discovery (ECF No. 467), joinder in or assent to the motion for entry of this order, and participation in the activities described in this order, does not constitute a waiver of any Fifth Amendment privilege or immunity, Eleventh Amendment privilege or immunity, qualified immunity, or other governmental immunity defenses.

B. Exchange of Freedom of Information Act Materials

(1) Within seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel will give written notice to counsel for defendants of documents and other information that they have obtained by means of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 15.231-246, or any statute or regulation of similar purpose in any other state. This paragraph applies only to information obtained relating to the alleged contamination of the City of Flint water supply on or after April 25, 2014.

(2) The notice described above shall concisely identify the public person, agency, or entity that provided the FOIA response, approximately when the response was provided, the form in which it was provided, approximately how large the response was, and the general types of materials included in the response. Counsel who wish to obtain copies of the materials identified in the notice may do so from the counsel who provided the notice, but must reimburse for the reasonable actual expense of providing them. Copies should be produced in the same form in which they were produced in response to the FOIA request unless they are no longer available in that form. Counsel have an obligation to ascertain the FOIA materials over which they have control.

(3) Within seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), counsel for defendants will give written notice to Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel of documents and other information that they have obtained by means of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 15.231-246, or any statute or regulation of similar purpose in any other state. This paragraph applies only to information obtained relating to the alleged contamination of the City of Flint water supply on or after April 25, 2014. The same procedures and requirements described in paragraph I.B(2) shall regulate the production of documents in this paragraph.

(4) All requests for FOIA information authorized under this Section shall be made no later than thirty-seven (37) days from entry of this CMO (June 6, 2019). Production of documents shall be made within fourteen (14) days after a requesting party delivers its written request.

III. Written Discovery

A. Privilege Logs

(1) Each party must maintain a log of potentially Privileged Communications.

(2) No party must include in its privilege log Privileged Communications between the party or the party's employees and the attorneys who represent the party in the Flint Water Cases or related litigation. With defendants, this paragraph only applies to Privileged Communications created or occurring on or after the date that a complaint was filed naming the defendant as a party to the Flint Water Cases or a related matter in this Court or any other. With plaintiffs, this paragraph only applies to Privileged Communications that were had on or after the date that the plaintiff filed a complaint in the Flint Water Cases or a related matter in this Court or any other. This exception shall not apply to communications shared with someone other than the party, or the party's employees, attorneys, experts, or insurer.

(3) The parties are not required to log Privileged Communications that are shared among parties who share a Joint Defense Agreement or Common Interest Agreement.

(4) No plaintiff must include in its privilege log confidential communications between the plaintiff's attorneys and Co-Lead Class Counsel or Co-Liaison Counsel, if the communications relate to matters within the scope of their duties. Similarly, no defendant in any Flint Water Case must include in its privilege log confidential communications between that defendant's attorneys and members of the Defense Executive Committee, if the communications relate to matters within the scope of their duties.

(5) No plaintiff who is also a plaintiff in a Genesee County case included within that court's Flint Water Litigation must include in its privilege log confidential communications between the plaintiff's attorneys and Lead Co-Liaison Counsel and Lead Class Action Counsel as appointed by the Genesee County Circuit Court, if the communications relate to matters within the scope of their duties. Similarly, no defendant who is also a defendant in a Genesee County action included within that court's Flint Water Litigation must include in its privilege log confidential communications between the defendant's attorneys and the Lead Defense Counsel and Defendants' Lead Class Action Counsel as appointed by the Genesee County Circuit Court, if the communications relate to matters within the scope of their duties.

(6) The failure to include in a privilege log any Privileged Communication exempted by this section shall not constitute a waiver of the privilege.

(7) As used in this Section, references to an attorney includes other attorneys and employees in an attorney's firm, outside counsel, contract attorneys, and legal services vendors hired by an attorney's firm. With respect to parties that are not natural persons, it also includes in-house attorneys and other employees on the party's legal staff and legal services vendors hired by the party.

B. Requests for Documents and Tangible Things

(1) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel may serve requests for production of documents and tangible things on defendants. These counsel will coordinate so that defendants shall not need to respond to the same request twice. Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), counsel for defendants may also serve requests for production of documents and tangible things on the named plaintiffs in the consolidated putative class action Carthan v. Snyder, No. 16-cv-10444. However, no defendant may serve such requests on any named plaintiff whose claims against that defendant have been dismissed in their entirety.

(2) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), each defendant may serve requests for production of documents and tangible things on other defendants. However, no defendant may serve such requests on any defendant which is not a current codefendant with it in at least one of the Flint Water Cases.

(3) Parties shall follow Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2)(A) in responding to requests for production of documents and tangible things. Within ninety-seven (97) days from entry of this CMO (August 5, 2019), parties shall substantially complete requests for production of documents and tangible things ("Substantial Completion"), with the exception that this deadline only applies to requests made within fourteen (14) days from entry of this CMO (May 14, 2019).

(4) Counsel for defendants shall serve requests for production of documents and tangible things on plaintiffs in the Individual Cases pursuant to Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

C. Interrogatories

(1) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel may serve interrogatories on defendants. These counsel will coordinate so that defendants shall not need to respond to the same interrogatory request twice. Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), counsel for defendants may also serve interrogatories on the named plaintiffs in Carthan. However, no defendant may serve such interrogatories on any named plaintiff whose claims against that defendant have been dismissed in their entirety.

(2) Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel may serve no more than thirty (30) interrogatories on each defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, on each group of defendants). These interrogatories may be served divided up into sets of interrogatories, but no more than a total of thirty (30) may be served on any defendant unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(3) Defendants may collectively serve twenty-five (25) interrogatories on each named plaintiff in Carthan. Additionally, each defendant may individually serve five (5) interrogatories on each named plaintiff in Carthan.4 These interrogatories may be divided up into sets of interrogatories, but no more than the limits described in this paragraph may be served on any named plaintiff in Carthan unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(4) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), defendants (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve twenty-five (25) interrogatories on each other defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, on each group of defendants). These interrogatories may be divided up into sets of interrogatories, but no more than twenty-five (25) may be served on any defendant by any other defendant unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(5) No defendant may serve any interrogatories on any defendant which is not a current codefendant with it in at least one of the Flint Water Cases.

(6) Counsel for defendants shall serve interrogatories on plaintiffs in the Individual Cases pursuant to Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

D. Requests for Admission

(1) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel may serve requests for admission on defendants. These counsel will coordinate so that defendants shall not need to respond to the same request twice. Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), defendants may also serve requests for admission on the named plaintiffs in Carthan. No defendant may serve a request on any plaintiff whose claims against that defendant have been dismissed in their entirety.

(2) Beginning seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), defendants (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve on each other defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, on each group of defendants) no more than twenty-five (25) requests for admission. These requests may be divided up into sets of requests, but no more than twenty-five (25) may be served on any defendant by any other defendant unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(3) No defendant may serve any requests for admission on any defendant which is not a current codefendant with it in at least one of the Flint Water Cases.

(4) Counsel for defendants shall serve requests for admission on plaintiffs in the Individual Cases pursuant to Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

E. Pending Criminal Charges

Defendants who are subject to pending criminal charges may petition the Court for relief from written discovery until after the final resolution of those criminal charges.

IV. Requests for Entry on, Inspection, Sampling, and Testing of Land

(1) Beginning thirty-seven (37) days from entry of this CMO (June 6, 2019), Co-Lead Class Counsel and Co-Liaison Counsel may serve requests for entry on, inspection, sampling, and testing of land on defendants. Plaintiffs shall have the collective right to enter on, inspect, sample, and test each piece of land owned or otherwise controlled by each defendant only once, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court. Each entry shall not last more than seven (7) hours, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(2) Beginning thirty-seven (37) days from entry of this CMO (June 6, 2019), defendants may serve requests for entry on, inspection, sampling, and testing of land on the named plaintiffs in Carthan. Defendants shall have the collective right to enter on, inspect, sample, and test each piece of land owned or otherwise controlled by each named plaintiff only once, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court. Each entry shall not last more than seven (7) hours, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(3) Beginning thirty-seven (37) days from entry of this CMO (June 6, 2019), defendants (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve requests for entry on, inspection, sampling, and testing of land on each other defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, on each group of defendants). No defendant may serve any requests for entry on, inspection, sampling, and testing of land on any defendant which is not a current codefendant with it in at least one of the Flint Water Cases.

(4) Counsel for defendants shall serve requests for entry on, inspection, sampling, and testing of land on plaintiffs in the Individual Cases pursuant to Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

V. Fact Witness Depositions

A. Testimonial Depositions

(1) Beginning thirty (30) days from Substantial Completion of document production (September 4, 2019), parties may begin serving parties and non-parties with notices of testimonial deposition. However, this is with the exception of the plaintiffs in the Individual Cases who shall be served in accordance with Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

(2) No deposition notice shall specify a deposition date that is less than thirty (30) days from the date the notice is served, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(3) There shall not be any numerical limit on the number of testimonial depositions any party may take as a matter of right—the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(i) shall not apply— but any party or non-party may move for a protective order with respect to any deposition for any of the reasons recognized in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(4) No named plaintiff or any employee of the named plaintiff in Carthan may be deposed for more than twelve (12) on-the-record hours unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court.

(5) No defendant or any employee of the defendant may be deposed for more than fourteen (14) on-the-record hours unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court. Of the fourteen (14) permitted on-the-record hours, no fewer than six (6) shall be allotted to counsel for defendants, to be allocated between them by agreement. Allocation of the other eight (8) hours shall be for counsel for the plaintiffs, to be allocated between them by agreement.

(6) No non-party witness may be deposed for more than twelve (12) on-the-record hours, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or with leave of court. Six (6) of the twelve (12) on-the record hours shall be allotted to counsel for the plaintiffs, to be allocated between them by agreement. The remaining six (6) hours shall be allotted to counsel for the defendants to be allocated among them by agreement.

B. Depositions of Health Care Providers, and Education and Plumbing Professionals

(1) Because of the very large number of plaintiffs and, potentially, of absent class members, there are some types of witnesses whose testimony cannot practically be taken only once. This may include health care providers, education professionals, and plumbers. Witnesses of these types are excluded from the one-deposition-only rule.

(2) Parties shall seek to minimize the unavoidable burden that will be imposed on witnesses of these types in all ways reasonably possible. Measures to be considered with respect to each witness shall include, among others: stipulating in advance to the authenticity and other foundational facts bearing on the admissibility of records related to the plaintiff in whose case the deposition is taken; designating a single defense attorney and a single plaintiffs' attorney to conduct the deposition on behalf of all defendants and plaintiffs; stipulating to the admissibility of testimony by the witness concerning their background, training, experience, and other matters that are of common relevance to more than the specific case in which the deposition is taken; and conducting depositions of the witness in two or more plaintiffs' cases on a single day if convenient to the witness.

C. Pending Criminal Charges

Defendants who are subject to pending criminal charges may petition the Court for relief from testimonial depositions until after the final resolution of those criminal charges.

D. Deposition Protocol Order

The Parties will cooperate in the notice and taking of depositions as follows:

(1) Governing Provisions and Law

This CMO controls depositions of all non-expert witnesses, including Non-Parties. It does not apply to depositions taken pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) or expert depositions taken pursuant to Section VII (Expert Witnesses). Discovery shall be governed by the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, except as otherwise provided herein. Unless specifically modified, nothing in this Order shall be construed to abrogate, modify, or enlarge the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of the presiding Court.

(2) Notices of Deposition

(a) Cooperation. Counsel are expected to cooperate and coordinate the scheduling of depositions and shall consider the scheduling needs or requests of all parties. However, subject to the provisions of this CMO, the deposition date need only be agreed to by the Noticing Party and the Deponent to proceed to scheduling with the Court Reporter.

(b) Contents and Service of Notice. Notices of Deposition will be served by email on the Deponent, the Court Reporter, and on all parties to the Flint Litigation in accordance with this CMO. Consistent with this Court's Order Preserving Certain Immunities and Defenses for Purposes of Limited Pre-Answer Discovery (ECF No. 467), joinder in or assent to the motion for entry of this order, and participation in the activities described in this order, does not constitute a waiver of any Fifth Amendment privilege or immunity, Eleventh Amendment privilege or immunity, qualified immunity, or other governmental immunity defenses. The Notice shall state the name of the deponent, contact information for the Noticing Party, and designate the proposed date and location in accordance with Section V(A)(2) (requiring 30 days' notice unless otherwise agreed to by all interested parties or by leave of court) and Section V(D)(4) below (defining locations). The notice shall also include a statement that all depositions will be video recorded and include a reference to this CMO. If the Deponent is a non-party, the Notice shall include a subpoena as appropriate. The notice shall also include substantially the following statement: "If the date and location is not convenient to the Deponent, the Deponent (or his or her counsel) shall contact the Noticing Party's counsel within five (5) business days to arrange an alternate date and/or location."

(c) Who Must Agree to Deposition Date. Within five (5) business days of the issuance of the Notice, the Noticing Party and the Deponent, through his or her counsel if known, shall meet and confer to negotiate the deposition date. Any disputes between the Noticing Party and the Deponent regarding the date of a deposition may be raised to the Court following the meet and confer process. After expiration of the five (5) business days, the Noticing Party shall promptly inform all parties to the Flint Litigation and the Court Reporter by email either confirming the original deposition date and location, notifying all parties of the new date or location, or updating the parties as to the status of any dispute with respect to the deposition notice. When sending an email confirming a deposition, the Noticing Party shall circulate a confirming or amending deposition notice with any accompanying subpoena to the Court Reporter with the email title "Flint: CONFIRMED Deposition of [Enter Deponent Name] [ENTER DATES]" and clearly stating in the body of the email that the deposition has been confirmed with the deponent and is proceeding to scheduling. The final notice shall otherwise conform with the provisions of Section V(D)(2) and shall include any other deposition requirements. Any subpoenas for deposition testimony shall be served as required by governing law, but copies shall be served via email on all parties to the Flint Water Cases.

(d) Objections to Deposition Notices. Any party wishing to raise an objection or a scheduling conflict with the Noticing Party shall do so within three (3) business days after the deposition is confirmed by the Noticing Party. The Noticing Party will attempt to resolve the objection. If the objecting party and the Noticing Party cannot agree, they may contact the Court wherein the deposition is noticed for resolution. Parties in all other Flint Water Cases shall have the opportunity to attend and participate in any depositions, except those of individual plaintiffs, where attendance is permitted but not participation.5 Any subsequent changes to the date of a deposition shall by communicated to all parties to the Flint Litigation by the Noticing Party using the email title "Flint: REVISED CONFIRMED Deposition of [Enter Party/Witness Name] [ENTER NEW DATES]" and explaining the change in date or location in the body of the email.

(e) Master Schedule and Equipment. The Court Reporter will make arrangements for the services required in the confirmed final Notice of Deposition (including court reporter, videographer, conference room reservations and if indicated, interpreter). The Court Reporter will communicate confirmation that deposition arrangements have been made by uploading an updated Master Deposition Calendar. The parties will be responsible for any additional costs incurred by the Court Reporter for additional services required for any deposition (such as translator, videographer, etc.). The Court Reporter shall maintain a Master Deposition Calendar that will be posted with regular updates to the date, time, and location of any scheduled depositions.

(3) Depositions

(a) Number of Depositions. More than one deposition may take place in the Flint Water Cases at the same time, except that no more than three (3) depositions may be scheduled on the same day absent agreement by the parties or court order.

(b) Deposition Days. Absent agreement of the parties, all depositions will be scheduled for two (2) days, including the business day on which the deposition is noticed as well as the next business day. The Master Schedule shall so reflect the two-day scheduling for all depositions. A Deposition Day shall typically commence at 9:00a.m. Minimally, there shall be one fifteen (15) minute morning break and two fifteen (15) minute afternoon breaks, with one (1) hour for lunch. Variations in this schedule may be made by agreement of counsel who noticed the deposition and counsel for the deponent.

(c) Holidays. No depositions may be scheduled on the day of an in-person Court hearing in any of the Flint Water Cases or any national or religious holiday. For purposes of this deposition protocol, such holidays are: New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday, Presidents' Day, Passover (2 days), Good Friday, Easter Monday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Rosh Hashanah (2 days), Yom Kippur, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving (Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday), Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day.

(4) Deposition Appearance and Location

(a) Location. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, or by court order, depositions will take place in Michigan in Genesee County, Wayne County, Washtenaw County, or Oakland County at a location arranged by the Court Reporter. The Court Reporter will provide a list of approved deposition locations to be selected by the Noticing Party in issuing any deposition notice.

(b) Arrangement for Deposition Space. The Court Reporter will be responsible for reserving the necessary conference room and providing the necessary technical equipment for each deposition.

(c) Notice of Intent to Appear. At least fifteen (15) days before a deposition, any counsel that intends to attend shall notify the Court Reporter. The Court Reporter will maintain a list of all parties who have given notice of their intent to appear and shall make the list available to all parties on the Master Calendar

(5) Attendance and Confidentiality

(a) Protective Order. If good cause exists for limiting access to depositions, the party seeking to exclude individuals from the deposition must move for a protective order "designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(E). To meet this burden, the moving party must show "good cause" that an order is necessary "to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1).

(b) Appearance by Telephone or Other Remote Means. Any party may alternatively appear and participate by telephone or other audiovisual means available and shall give notice of their intent to do so in at least fifteen (15) days before the deposition in accordance with Section V(D)(4)(c) (Notice of Intent to Appear). The Party shall not re-record the deposition by video or audio means. Parties participating remotely must identify all persons attending at the deposition with them. If counsel participating remotely believes that an objection not already made must be made on the record, such counsel shall identify themselves and state the objection. Counsel participating in depositions by remote access shall have the same opportunity to examine the witnesses as counsel attending in person.

(c) Confidentiality Order Provisions Regarding Deposition Materials and Testimony

(i) Counsel for a producing party may designate testimony as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" by identifying it as such on the record at or about the time the testimony is given. With respect to deposition exhibits, counsel for a producing party may designate such exhibits, or portions of them, as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys Eyes' Only" by identifying them as such on the record at or before the conclusion of the deposition, provided, however, that no such designation need be made with respect to exhibits that have previously been marked in a manner to make them Protected Material.

(ii) A non-party witness who is not an employee of a party, or the witness's attorney, may designate testimony or exhibits as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" in the same manner described in subparagraph (c)(i). But in all cases where such designation is made by a non-party witness or the witness's attorney, both the witness and his or her attorney shall be deemed to have accepted, by making the designation, all obligations created by the Confidentiality Order.

(iii) If no testimony is designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" at a deposition, the deposition testimony and the entire transcript shall be accorded the highest level of protection for a period of fifteen (15) calendar days after the final transcript (that is to say, not a draft transcript) is received by or becomes available to a producing party's attorney of record for a party or party's attorney to identify the testimony or transcript as "Confidential or "Highly Confidential." If, before expiration of such 15-day period, any party or attorney makes or joins in a designation of testimony as "Confidential or "Highly Confidential" that party or attorney must notify counsel of record for all other parties to the actions in which the deposition was taken of the pages and lines of deposition testimony that are "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only," then those pages and lines, but no other pages and lines, shall remain subject to the protection of this Order after the 15-day period has ended.

(iv) All transcripts of depositions at which testimony has been designated in accordance with subparagraph (c)(i) or (c)(ii) as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be marked by the court reporter on the cover page with one or both of those designations and each page on which testimony appears that was identified as protectable at the deposition shall likewise be marked with one or both of those designations; but in making use of the deposition testimony and transcript the persons bound by the Confidentiality Order shall be limited in their use only of the testimony and portions of the transcript that was identified as protectable at the deposition.

(v) All transcripts of depositions at which the statement described in subparagraph (c)(iii) was made shall be marked by the court reporter on the cover page with one or both of those designations. In the event no written designation of specific protectable testimony is provided in accordance with subparagraph (c)(iii), persons bound by this Order may obliterate the designations placed on the cover page. In the event a written designation of specific protectable testimony is provided in accordance with subparagraph (c)(iii), all persons bound by this Order shall treat those pages and lines as required by this Order for Protected Material.

(vi) Deposition exhibits designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be marked as provided in ¶ 8(a) of the Confidentiality Order.

(vii) If testimony taken at an audiovisually-recorded deposition is designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only," the videocassette, other videotape container, or disk on which the deposition was recorded shall be marked by affixing a label to it with the appropriate designation.

(6) Apportionment of Time and Sequence of Examination

(a) Length of Depositions. The apportionment of time shall be made pursuant to Section V(A) of the CMO as follows:

Plaintiffs. Any Plaintiff may be deposed for 12 hours by the Defendants Defendants. Any Defendant may be deposed for 14 hours — 6 hours are allocated amongst the defendants by agreement, 8 hours are allocated amongst the plaintiffs Non-Parties. Any Non-Party may be deposed for 12 hours — 6 hours for the plaintiffs, 6 hours for the defendants

(b) Sequence of Examination. Questioning at the depositions taken by plaintiffs' counsel will be conducted in the following sequence:

(i) the primary examiner selected by plaintiffs' counsel; (ii) other plaintiffs' attorneys on non-redundant matters; (iii) examination by the defendants; (iv) individual counsel for the deponent, if any; and (v) any re-cross or re-direct by those mentioned above.

Questioning at the depositions taken by defense counsel shall be conducted in the following sequence:

(i) the primary defense counsel examiner or noticing party; (ii) other defendants on non-redundant matters; (iii) examination by the plaintiffs; (iv) individual counsel for the deponent, if any; and (v) any re-cross or re-direct by those mentioned above.

(c) Allocation of Time Among Plaintiffs. Absent agreement or further order of the court, the time allocated shall be coordinated amongst plaintiffs' counsel.

(d) Allocation of Time Among Defendants. Absent agreement or further order of the court, the time allocated to the Defendants shall be as follows:

• State Defendants — 16.6% • City Defendants — 16.6% • Rowe — 16.6% • LAN Defendants — 16.6% • VNA Defendants — 16.6% • Hospital Defendants — 16.6%

The exception to the time allocated above is as follows:

(i) When the State of Michigan is acting as plaintiff in the state court case, People v. Veolia North America, et al., then their allotted time for depositions will increase. The State of Michigan will receive up to 1.45 hours when either VNA or LAN are being deposed—the time in excess to the above 16.6% already allocated is to be drawn equally from Plaintiffs and Defendants.

(ii) When MDEQ Defendants wish to depose certain parties, the time allocation between Defendants is to be split in such a way as to provide MDEQ with up to 45 minutes per deposition.

(e) Court Reporter Responsibility for Timing. The Court Reporter shall be responsible for recording and tracking of time of questioning for each Party during the deposition. For purposes of tracking and apportionment of time, only time on the record shall be computed against the total time allocated to each party.

(7) Video Recorded Depositions. Audio-Video Recording of All Depositions. All depositions shall be audiovisual depositions recorded pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(3) and subject to the following rules:

(a) Real-time feed. All video depositions will be stenographically recorded by a court reporter with "real-time feed" capabilities. Nothing herein precludes any party from ordering "real-time feed" of any non-video deposition.

(b) Video Operator. The operator(s) of the video recording equipment shall be subject to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(C). At the commencement of the deposition, the operator(s) shall swear or affirm to record the proceedings fair and accurately.

(c) Filing. The Operator shall preserve custody of the original video medium in its original condition until further order of the Court.

(d) Interruptions. The video camera operation will be suspended during the deposition only upon stipulation by counsel and "off the record" discussions.

(e) Filming. The videographer shall film the witness only while the witness is seated in the witness chair and shall not film the witness at any other time, including when entering or leaving the deposition room. The videographer shall not film any other persons in the room, except for the witness.

(8) Objections and Disputes

(a) Stipulations and Disputes. The Parties may agree to certain deposition stipulations, however in all other circumstances the Federal and local rules control. The Parties shall use best efforts to avoid deposition disruptions or adjournments due to discovery disputes. In the event a dispute arises, the parties may contact the Court in an attempt to resolve such dispute informally. If the Court is unavailable, the deposition will continue as to matters not in dispute and the party seeking relief may present the issue to the Court for expedited consideration pursuant to the Court's discovery dispute protocol.

(b) Objections. During a deposition, any objection by counsel for any plaintiff shall be deemed an objection on behalf of all plaintiffs. It shall not be necessary for counsel for each plaintiff to separately object on the record to preserve the objection. Similarly, any objection by counsel for any defendant shall be deemed an objection on behalf of all defendants. It will not be necessary for counsel for each defendant to separately object on the record to preserve the objection. But no party is bound by another party's objection, and nothing in this paragraph shall preclude any party from stating its own objection on the record if that objection has not been made. Counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c)(2) concerning objections at depositions. Speaking objections or those calculated to coach the deponent are prohibited. Counsel shall refrain from engaging in colloquy during depositions.

(9) Transcript Repository, Read and Sign, and Errata Sheets

(a) Read and Sign. Witnesses shall read and sign their deposition transcripts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern the time each witness has to read and sign unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court. Counsel for the witness shall submit any errata pages and signatures to the court reporter via email. The Court Reporter shall coordinate, track, and maintain a record as to the status and signature by witnesses of deposition transcripts. The Deponent's counsel will be provided with an e-transcript, an errata page and a witness signature page for review, signature and return to the Court Reporter.

(b) Transcript Repository. The Court Reporter will provide a searchable electronic copy of all deposition transcripts to the parties via the Court Reporter Repository, except that deposition testimony and exhibits designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" shall only be made available to the appropriate parties under the Confidentiality Order.

(10) Exhibits

(a) The Court Reporter shall maintain a Master Exhibit List and an online Deposition Exhibit Repository which will contain a single copy of all deposition exhibits used in the case, and will make the Exhibit Repository available at all depositions taken in the Flint Litigation. The Court Reporter will maintain an original (hard copy) deposition transcript for all depositions in their office.

(b) At least seven (7) days before a deposition, counsel for each party that intends to examine a deponent ("Examining Counsel") shall serve via electronic mail to counsel for any Plaintiff Group or Defendant Group who have indicated that they will attend, a non-binding list of documents (by Bates number) that they anticipate using or referring to during the deposition.

(c) Examining Counsel shall bring paper copies of any documents used at a deposition (whether or not they are pre-designated). Examining Counsel shall not bring copies of pre-designated documents for any other counsel present at the deposition. However, Examining Counsel shall provide paper copies of any non-designated documents to counsel for any Plaintiff Group or Defendant Group who have indicated that they will attend.

(d) Deposition exhibits shall be marked sequentially beginning with the first witness, and steps will be taken to ensure that no two exhibits used in a deposition contain the same Exhibit Number. In the event of double or triple tracking depositions, Exhibit Numbers will be blocked in advance to avoid duplication of Exhibit Numbers. Counsel shall not re-mark documents that have previously been marked as exhibits, and shall use the previously marked exhibit number in subsequent depositions. The index of exhibits annexed to each deposition transcript shall contain the Bates number (if any), the exhibit number and a brief description of the exhibit.

(e) The Court Reporter will make available electronically at every deposition all documents maintained in the Deposition Exhibit Repository for use as exhibits.

(11) Costs. The Parties have selected Golkow as the Court Reporting Company on the Flint Water Cases. Costs will be allocated according to each party ordering transcripts, with the exception of remote access and participation which will be charged on a per party basis for those wishing to appear remotely, and videographer costs, which would be allocated amongst parties ordering the video.

VI. Plaintiff Examinations

The schedule for examinations of the plaintiffs in the Individual Cases will be pursuant to Section X (Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases).

VII. Expert Witnesses

(1) Parties may serve notice of a deposition on expert witnesses who have been retained or employed by any other party and who have completed an expert report or disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 26(a)(2)(B) or (C) in relation to the alleged contamination of the City of Flint's water supply on or after April 25, 2014. These expert witnesses shall be produced for deposition without need for service of a subpoena.

(2) Expert witnesses shall deliver to the attorney who noticed the deposition an advance production of their complete file no later than seven (7) days before the date set for a deposition. The file shall include all materials compiled up to that time, except that the expert may exclude any portions protected by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4). The attorney who noticed the deposition shall provide copies of the advance production to counsel for all other parties who have notified them of their intent to participate in the deposition.

(3) The party who notices the deposition shall reimburse the expert for the time reasonably and actually devoted by the expert or their employees to making the advance production; the time reasonably and actually devoted by the expert in traveling to and from the site of the deposition; the time spent by the expert at the deposition; the expense reasonably and actually incurred by the expert in producing other documents in response to any other request for production of documents; and the reasonable travel expenses (transportation, meals, lodging, miscellaneous) actually incurred by the expert in traveling to and from the site of the deposition and during their attendance at the deposition.

(4) Unless an expert agrees otherwise, their deposition shall be taken in the locality where they work or reside.

VIII. Class Certification in Carthan

(1) Within ten (10) months from entry of this CMO (March 2, 2020), a motion for class certification and supporting Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures shall be filed. Within three (3) months from the filing of the motion for class certification, any opposition and supporting Rule 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures shall be filed. Within two (2) months from the filing of any opposition, a reply in support of class certification shall be filed.

(2) A hearing on the motion for class certification shall be set following the filing of the reply. Within two (2) weeks from the filing of the reply, defendants shall notify the Court if an evidentiary hearing is requested.

IX. Notices of Non-Parties at Fault in the Individual Actions

Any party filing a Notice of Non-Parties at Fault in each of the individual Flint Water Cases pursuant to MCR 2.112(K) shall file a short form Notice of Non-Parties at Fault, incorporating by reference their Master Notice of Non-Parties at Fault filed in Walters v. Flint, Case No. 5:17-cv-10164. [See Exhibit B]. The short form notice shall include and incorporate any supplements filed to the Master Notice, which shall be deemed applicable to the short form Notice filed in each of the individual cases. A party shall not be required to file a full notice of Non-Parties at Fault in each of the individual actions in order to comply with the requirements set forth in MCR 2.112(K) as the Master Notice of Non-Parties at Fault and any supplements thereto shall be incorporated in full by reference as if it were set forth at length in each individual action.

X. Bellwether Trial Proceedings in the Individual Cases

The initial bellwether trial will begin on October 28, 2020.

A. First Bellwether Pool Selection

(1) Within seven (7) days from entry of this CMO (May 7, 2019), Co-Liaison Counsel and counsel for defendants shall submit to the Court an agreed-upon form of plaintiff fact sheet. If agreement upon fact sheets cannot be reached, the Court will place this issue on the May 15, 2019, status conference agenda.

(2) Within fourteen (14) days from entry of this CMO (May 14, 2019), the Special Master shall, based on census data that she has collected, identify the names of all individual plaintiffs whose dates of birth are between April 25, 2008, and April 25, 2014, and who only claim lead-induced injuries. The Special Master shall identify the numbers of the cases in which these individuals are plaintiffs.

(3) Within twenty-one (21) days from entry of this CMO (May 21, 2019), Co-Liaison Counsel and counsel for defendants shall select 150 plaintiffs ("Pool One Claimants") from those identified by the Special Master, using a selection process to which they agree and which will result in the selection of a random sample.

(4) Within fifty (50) days from the selection of the Pool One Claimants, each of the 150 plaintiffs shall provide to counsel for defendants completed plaintiff fact sheets, together with authorizations for release of records specified in the fact sheets and any documents specified in the fact sheets which are within their possession, custody, or control (as those words are used in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)).

(5) To the extent a plaintiff's fact-sheet is less than substantially completed, Co-Liaison Counsel shall be notified within seven (7) days by counsel for defendants, and the deficiency shall be cured to the extent possible within seven (7) days after receiving notification.

B. Second Bellwether Pool Selection and Written Discovery

(1) On day seventy (70) following the selection of the Pool One Claimants, Co-Liaison Counsel and counsel for defendants shall simultaneously identify to each other a total of 100 claimants from among the Pool One Claimants with respect to whom written discovery will be conducted ("Pool Two Claimants"). Half of the Pool Two Claimants will be selected by Co-Liaison Counsel and half will be selected by counsel for defendants. If there is overlap between the Pool Two Claimants identified by the two sides, selection of additional claimants shall continue until a total of 100 claimants have been selected.

(2) Beginning seventy-one (71) days from the selection of the Pool One Claimants, defendants may serve on each of the 100 Pool Two Claimants requests for production of documents and tangible things, interrogatories, and requests for admission.

(3) Each defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve on each Pool Two Claimant who has sued that defendant requests for production of documents and tangible things that comprise no more than thirty (30) separately numbered paragraphs describing with reasonable particularity specific documents and things or categories of documents and things to be produced. The thirty (30) separately numbered paragraphs may be divided among as many separate sets of requests as the defendant serving them chooses, but the total number of paragraphs shall not exceed thirty (30) unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court.

(4) Each defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants and the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve on each Pool Two Claimant who has sued that defendant up to twenty-five (25) interrogatories. The twenty-five (25) interrogatories may be divided among as many separate sets of interrogatories as the defendant serving them chooses, but the total number of interrogatories shall not exceed twenty-five (25) unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court.

(5) Each defendant (or, in the case of the VNA Defendants or the LAN Defendants, each group of defendants) may serve on each Pool Two Claimant who has sued that defendant up to twenty-five (25) requests for admission. The twenty-five (25) requests for admission may be divided among as many separate sets of requests as the defendant serving them chooses, but the total number of requests shall not exceed twenty-five (25) unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court.

C. Third Bellwether Pool Selection and Further Discovery

(1) On day ninety (90) following the selection of the Pool Two Claimants, Co-Liaison Counsel and counsel for defendants shall each identify thirty (30) claimants from among the Pool Two Claimants who will be engaged in further discovery ("Pool Three Claimants"). If there is overlap between the Pool Three Claimants initially identified by the two sides, selection of additional Pool Three Claimants shall proceed in the manner described in this paragraph until a total of sixty (60) have been selected.

(2) Beginning seven (7) days from selection of the Pool Three Claimants, defendants may begin noticing testimonial depositions of the Pool Three Claimants in accordance with this CMO. Defendants may also notice testimonial depositions of other persons with knowledge of facts particular to claims by the Pool Three Claimants in accordance with this CMO. There shall be no specific numerical limit on the number of testimonial depositions that may be taken, but no party or non-party witness is precluded from bringing a motion for a protective order if there is good cause for doing so.

(3) Nothing in this Section is intended to prevent any party from deposing any other party or non-party before the date specified in this Section if the witness is reasonably likely to have discoverable information relevant to the issues in Carthan or if relevant to issues in any Genesee County case included in In re Flint Water Litigation.

(4) Beginning seven (7) days from the selection of the Pool Three Claimants, defendants may begin noticing and conducting entries upon land in the possession or control of the Pool Three Claimants for purposes of inspection, photographing, sampling, and testing. Defendants shall coordinate among themselves so that representatives of all defendants which have been sued by any Pool Three Claimant will complete their entries on the same date or dates, unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court.

D. Expert Depositions

(1) Within six (6) months from selection of the Pool Three Claimants, but no sooner than the filing of the motion for class certification in Carthan, Co-Liaison Counsel shall provide full and complete Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures from all experts who have produced such reports and disclosures with respect to the Pool Three Claimants.

(2) Beginning ten (10) days from the date Co-Liaison Counsel provides these Rule 26(a)(2) reports and disclosures, Each Pool Three Claimant shall begin appearing for Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 examinations, on dates reasonably identified by defendants which that claimant has sued. These examinations shall be conducted by suitably licensed or certified examiners identified by defendants. Examiners shall examine the claimant on the same day if the examiners are specialists in the same field unless the nature of the examinations make simultaneous examinations impractical. Examiners who are specialists in different fields may examine the claimant on different days. However, all examinations shall be completed within thirty (30) days unless otherwise agreed by all interested parties or by leave of court. After completion of all Pool Three Claimant Rule 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures and Rule 35 examinations, defendants may begin noticing depositions of the plaintiffs' experts.

(3) Beginning sixty (60) days from completion of all Pool Three Claimant Rule 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures, and at least fifteen (15) days from completion of depositions of plaintiffs' experts, defendants shall provide full and complete Rule 26(a)(2) expert reports and disclosures to Co-Liaison Counsel. After disclosure of all defendant expert reports and disclosures, Co-Liaison Counsel may begin noticing depositions of the defendants' experts.

E. Bellwether Trial Selection

The selection process for the bellwether trials will be established by the Court at a later date.

XI. Discovery Dispute Protocol

(1) Conduct a meet and confer on the issue.

(2) If the parties reach an impasse, email Abigail DeHart

(Abigail_DeHart@mied.uscourts.gov) and Leslie Calhoun (Leslie_Calhoun@mied.uscourts.gov) with two or three sentences indicating the nature of the dispute, copied to the executive committee for defendants,6 co-lead interim class counsel, and co-liaison counsel. This email must indicate that there has been a meet and confer on the issue and that there is an impasse. All relevant parties to the dispute must be copied on this email. The dispute must be submitted by the previous Thursday at 2:00 pm in order to be considered for resolution the following Wednesday. The Court will set forth its availability for these conferences in the order that follows each monthly status conference.

(3) The Court will then accept the topic for a biweekly conference call, authorize briefing on the topic, or place the issue on the agenda for the next status conference. The parties will learn of the Court's decision after the agenda for the next call is set and docketed.

(4) If the topic is accepted for the biweekly conference call, then pursuant to the timeline specified in the agenda, parties to the dispute must submit a one-page, single-spaced summary of the issue via email to Ms. DeHart and Ms. Calhoun. Do not file these on the docket. The disputed request may be attached to the one-page summary of the issue. (wkim@cityofflint.com) for City Defendants, (5) Craig Thompson (cthompson@swappc.com) for Rowe Defendants, (6) Susan Smith (ssmith@bdlaw.com) for McLaren Defendants, and Richard Kuhl (KuhlR@michigan.gov) for State Defendants.

(5) The Court will generally convene a one-hour conference call as needed every two weeks on Wednesday afternoons, usually at 2:00 pm. These calls will not normally be on the record. If a party seeks to have the dispute on the record, then this must be requested in advance of the call by email.

XII. Pre-Trial Motions and Completion Date for Discovery in All Cases

The date by which all pre-trial motions shall be filed and the completion date for discovery will be established by the Court at a later date.

XIII. Definitions

(1) "Privileged Communications" mean attorney/client privileged communications, communications that constitute protected work product, and communications with experts that are protected from disclosure by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4).

(2) "Co-Lead Class Counsel" means the attorneys appointed from time to time by the Court to serve in that capacity as well as persons authorized by those persons to act in their stead. (ECF No. 696.)

(3) "Co-Liaison Counsel" means the attorneys appointed from time to time by the Court to serve in that capacity as well as persons authorized by those persons to act in their stead. (Id.)

(4) "Defense Executive Committee" means the attorneys appointed from time to time by the Court to serve in that capacity as well as persons authorized by those persons to act in their stead. (ECF No. 260 adopting ECF No. 241.)

(5) "Carthan" means the consolidated putative class action case Carthan v. Snyder, No. 16-cv-10444.

(6) "Individual Cases" means cases filed by persons that are set forth in Short Form Complaints and the Master Complaint, in accordance with the order dated November 17, 2017. (ECF No. 260.)

(7) "Plaintiffs" means the putative class representatives in Carthan and the plaintiffs in the Individual Cases, collectively.

(8) "VNA Defendants" means Veolia North America, LLC, Veolia North America, Inc., Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC, insofar as each of the above individuals and entities remain as a party.

(9) "LAN Defendants" means Lockwood, Andrews, & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews, & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company, insofar as each of the above individuals and entities remain as a party.

XIV. Appendices

A. Exhibit A — Document Production Protocol [ECF No. 371-1]

B. Exhibit B — Sample Short Form Non-Party at Fault Filing for Individual Actions

C. Exhibit C — Confidentiality Order [ECF No. 299]

D. Exhibit D — Addendum to the Confidentiality Order [ECF No. 790]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re Flint Water Cases No. 5:16-cv-10444 HON. JUDITH E. LEVY MAG. MONA K. MAJZOUB

DOCUMENT PRODUCTION PROTOCOL

I. SCOPE

A. General

The procedures set forth in this Document Production Protocol (the "Order") shall govern the production of Documents in this above-captioned matter (the "Litigation"), unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties or as ordered of the Court. To the extent that non-parties produce Documents in this case, the Parties agree to request that such non-parties adopt this Order.

B. Scope of Production

This Order does not address the scope of the Parties' productions.

C. Subsequent Orders and Modification

This Order shall not preclude subsequent agreements between the Parties relating to Documents, nor shall it preclude any Party from seeking an amendment or modification of this Order from the Court.

This Order may not be modified or amended except in writing signed by all Parties. Court approval is not required to modify or amend this Order, provided that such modification or amendment is in writing signed by all Parties.

D. Previously Produced Documents

The Parties agree that Documents that have previously been produced in the Litigation, or in other related litigation, need not be re-produced to be consistent with this Order so long as the earlier productions are consistent with the attached ESI protocol(s). This provision only applies to productions made prior to the entry of this Order.

E. Confidentiality of Produced ESI

Nothing in this Order is intended to be inconsistent with the Stipulated Confidentiality Order that the Court has entered in this Litigation (Dkt. 299), and where anything in this Order is inconsistent with the terms of the Confidentiality Order, the terms of the Confidentiality Order shall prevail. If a document is produced subject to a claim that it is protected from disclosure under the Confidentiality Order, the word "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL" shall be burned electronically on each page of such document or otherwise identified as such consistent with this Order and any other orders entered by this Court.

II. DEFINITIONS

A. "Documents" means "Documents" as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a)(1)(A), and Electronically Stored Information, as defined below, and shall be interpreted in the broadest sense possible.

B. "Electronically stored information" or "ESI," as used herein, means and refers to computer-generated information or data, stored in or on any storage media located on computers, file servers, disks, tape, USB flash ("thumb") drives or other real or virtualized devices or media, as such information is defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a)(1)(A).

C. "Native Format" means and refers to the format of ESI in which it was generated or as it is used by the Producing Party in the usual course of its business and in its regularly conducted activities.

D. "Media" means an object or device, including but not limited to a disc, tape, computer, drive, or other device, whether or not in the Producing Party's physical possession, on which data is or was stored.

E. "Metadata" means and refers to: (i) information embedded in a native file that is not ordinarily viewable or printable from the application that generated, edited, or modified such native file; and (ii) information generated automatically by the operation of a computer or other information technology system when a native file is created, modified, transmitted, deleted, or otherwise manipulated by a user of such system.

F. "OCR" means and refers to an optical character recognition file which is created by software used in conjunction with a scanner that is capable of reading text-based Documents and making such Documents searchable using appropriate software.

G. "Party" or "Parties" means and refers to the named Plaintiffs and/or Defendants in the above-captioned matter. "Producing Party" refers to a Party (or non-party that avails itself of this Order) that produces Documents in this Litigation.

H. "Redacted Document" means any Document that contains a text box redaction over any portion of the Document, or contains other means to intentionally obscure any portion of the Document.

I. "Withheld document" means any Document that is omitted from production due to privilege or non-responsiveness.

III. MISCELLANEOUS

A. English Language

To the extent any data exists in more than one language, the data shall be produced in English, if available. If no English version of a document is available, the Producing Party does not have an obligation to produce an English translation of a document.

B. Cooperation

The Parties shall, as necessary, meet and confer to exchange information regarding issues associated with any production of Documents.

C. Reservation of Rights

Nothing contained herein is intended to create a precedent for, or to constitute a waiver or relinquishment of, any Party's objections or arguments pertaining to any potential future productions of Documents.

D. Relief from this Order

Any Party may request that the Court modify or amend the terms of this Order by the filing of an appropriate motion. Prior to filing such a motion, the Party seeking such modification or amendment must first meet and confer with the relevant Parties.

E. Production Costs

This Order does not address the costs of Document production and the Parties reserve their rights with respect to the allocation of those costs.

IV. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

A. Image Files

All Documents are to be produced as black and white images, unless otherwise addressed herein.

Black and white images are to be produced as Group IV, black and white single page TIFF images with the file extension,.TIFF.

To the extent a Party requests that any ESI be produced in color, as opposed to black and white, the Parties shall meet and confer as to whether reproduction in color is necessary and appropriate.

Each image file is to be named with its corresponding production bates number.

B. Image File Formats

Microsoft Word documents will be imaged showing track changes and comments.

Microsoft PowerPoint files will be imaged showing notes in Notes Pages.

C. Native Files

When producing Documents in Native Format, the files are to be named with the bates number assigned to the Document and the confidentiality legend, if applicable. For Example: Bates123456 — Confidential.XLSX

For each Native Format file produced, a TIFF image placeholder should be included. The placeholder is to state, "This document has been produced in native format" and it should be endorsed with the confidentiality legend, if applicable, and bates number.

A text file must be provided for each native file. If extracted text is not available, the text file should include a machine generated OCR.

Both the image and text file must be named with the bates number.

Documents that cannot be accurately TIFF-imaged must be produced in their Native Formats, unless otherwise agreed to between the Parties, or as required by this Order. Such files include video and audio recording and database files.

All spreadsheets should be produced in their Native Format, except those that require redaction (the requirements of which are detailed below).

The Parties agree to work out a future protocol governing the use and format of Documents produced pursuant to this paragraph at trial, depositions, and hearings.

D. Hard Copy Paper Documents

Hard copy paper documents shall be produced as images files, and, to the extent reasonably practicable, produced in the manner in which those documents were kept in the ordinary course of business. Where hard copy paper documents have "post-it notes," tabs, or other labels, such information shall be produced to the extent reasonably practicable. The Producing Party will utilize reasonable best efforts to ensure that hard copy paper documents are produced in a manner that maintains the physical unitization of documents.

E. Proprietary Files

To the extent that Documents produced cannot be rendered or viewed without the use of proprietary third-party software, the Parties shall meet and confer to minimize any expense or burden associated with the production of such Documents in a reasonably usable format, including issues as may arise with respect to obtaining access to any such software and operating manuals which are the property of a third-party.

F. Extracted Text/OCR

Each produced Document will have a single text file, named for the production bates number. The text files will delivered as multi-page ASCII. The location of the text file for a document will be captured in the TextFileLink field.

For native files, extracted text is to be produced.

For any redacted Documents, a machine generated OCR text file from the redacted image is it to be provided, except that information which is redacted.

For any hard copy paper documents, a machine generated OCR text file is it to be provided.

G. Metadata

Metadata fields associated with all Documents will be produced, as set forth below, except for Documents that do not include metadata, or the metadata is not machine extractable.

For Redacted Documents, metadata fields must be produced, except those that disclose redacted information Metadata should be provided in a .DAT file. The first line of the load file must include the field names. Each subsequent line will contain the fielded information for the Document. All.DAT files produced in this Litigation should contain the same fields in a consistent order.

This Order shall not be construed to affect whether information contained in the metadata produced shall be admissible evidence about the corresponding Document; rather, the Parties' positions with regard to admissibility shall be preserved.

H. Load File Specifications — Delimiters

The .DAT file will use the following delimiters for all Documents produced:

Delimiter Character Function ASCII Code þ Default The field delimiter 254 separates the load file columns "|" Pipe The text qualifier. 124 Marks the beginning and end of each load file field. ® Newline The delimiter that 174 marks the end of a line of extracted or long text. Concordance replaces all carriage returns or carriage return linefeed combinations with the newline code. Sample Concordance (.DAT) load file: þProdBegBatesþþProdEndBatesþþProdBegAttachþþProdEndAttachþ þGP0000001þþGP0000002þþþþ þGP0000003þþGP0000057þþþþ

I. Load File Specifications — Production Fields

The following fields will be provided for all Documents produced.

Field Name Description Applies To ProdBegBates Beginning bates All number of all Documents produced document ProdEndBates Ending bates All number of all Documents produced documents ProdBegAttach Beginning All attachment number Documents ProdEndAttach Ending attachment All number Documents Confidential Confidentiality All designation Documents NativeFileLink Production path to All native file Documents TextFileLink Production path to All extracted text or Documents OCR file

J. Load File Specifications — Metadata Fields

A Producing Party shall produce the following metadata fields for Documents, all Microsoft Word documents ("EDOC") and/or all email ("Email"), to the extent the information is available, as specified below:

Field Name Description Applies To Author Native file author EDOC File Name Name of the EDOC application file DateCreated Date file was created EDOC TimeCreated Time file was created EDOC DateMod Date file was last EDOC modified TimeLastMod Time file was EDOC modified To Recipient(s) Email From Sender Email CC Carbon copy Email recipient(s) BCC Blind carbon copy Email recipient(s) Subject Subject line of the Email email Date Sent Email sent date Email TimeSent Email sent time Email Date Rec Email received date Email TimeRcvd Email received time Email Custodian Individual in All possession of the Documents document or Mailbox. Other ***In the event cross All Custodian or custodian deduplication Documents dup custodian is employed Source Physical location, All computer or server Documents from which the data was collected DocType Type of file (Word, All Excel, email, etc) Documents DocExt File extension of All document Documents Native File Size of file in bytes All Size Documents Hash Value MD5 Hash Value All Documents Confidentiality All Designation Documents Redacted All Documents Withheld Identifies any Family All Member of a Documents Document that is omitted from production Email Folder All Path Documents Page Count All Documents Conversation All Index Documents

K. Deduplication

ESI will be deduplicated globally following industry-standard global deduplication algorithms. An acceptable method, such as the MD5 hash format, shall be used for any deduplication. Additional custodians who had a copy prior to deduplication, such as email recipients, copyees, or blind copyees, will be populated in the "DupCustodia" or "Other Custodian" metadata fields.

L. Document Families

Whenever a Document is produced, the entire corresponding family of Documents (i.e. parent and all children, the "Document Family," and individually a "Family Member") will be also produced. If a Family Member is withheld for any reason, then that Document should be replaced by a placeholder identifying that it has been withheld. Document Families will be produced with a continuous bates range. The Parties agree to meet and confer regarding any challenges to documents that are withheld from a document family as non-responsive.

Withholding non-responsive attachments cannot be used as a basis to challenge the completeness of a document for evidentiary purposes under FRE 106.

M. Email Threading

For emails, in addition to de-duplication, email threading may be utilized. Threading allows emails that are wholly contained in a later, surviving email, with all of the recipients and attachments contained, to be identified and suppressed from production. An email is only suppressed from production if 100% of the message body is contained, all addresses are included, and all attachments are included in a later email that is produced.

N. Voicemails, Text Messages and Smart Phone ESI

For production of these forms of ESI, the Parties shall meet and confer regarding the scope of said production and the applicable custodians for whom an obligation to search and produce exists. Production requests for these forms of ESI shall identify the custodian, search terms, and timeframe. Indiscriminate terms, such as the Party's name, are inappropriate unless combined with narrowing search criteria that sufficiently reduce the risk of overproduction. The Parties shall cooperate to identify the proper custodians, proper search terms and proper timeframe.

O. Redactions and Logs

A Producing Party shall disclose and describe the basis for every redaction in a Redacted Document.

The basis for all redactions shall be specified in the appropriate metadata field that corresponds to the Redacted Document.

In addition, for each redaction, a Producing Party must also: (a) include a text box describing the basis for the redaction ("Text Box Redactions") on the Redacted Document; or (b) produce a corresponding log that identifies and describes the basis for the redaction.

If a Party opts to utilize Text Box Redactions, the redactions on images shall be made with white boxes with black borders, and shall contain black text that describes the basis for the redaction, for example, "Attorney-Client Privilege," "Work Product Privilege," "PPI" (Protected Personal Information), "PHI" (Protected Health Information, or "NRI" (Non-Responsive Information). If a Party has more than one basis for a redaction, then the Text Box Redaction need only identify one basis, but all basis must be identified in the metadata.

Where some or all of the e-mail string is privileged, the Parties need only include one entry on the privilege log for the entire e-mail string and need not log each e-mail contained in the chain separately.

Documents that are to be produced in Native Format, but that require redactions, may be produced as TIFF images (as to spreadsheets, imaged unhiding hidden cells, rows, columns, or sheets), with extracted text, with the relevant portions redacted, or in Native Format using a commercially available "native redaction" tool, or by producing a copy of the Native Format file with the relevant portions replaced with the mark "[REDACTED"]or a similar mark. If modification of a Native Format file is required for redaction purposes, metadata information associated with that file should remain unchanged unless it also requires redaction.

P. De-Nisting of ESI

The Parties may remove operating system files and program files with the assistance of their respective information technology vendors or agents prior to conducting searches of data in accordance with the National Software Reference Library De-Nisting Process.

Q. Replacement Images

In the event that an already produced Document or set of Documents has to be re-produced or a new load file or "overlay" is produced for any production, the new production shall always maintain the same bates number for any re-produced Documents, with the addition of the suffix "-R" at the end of the bates number.

R. Production of Databases and Other Structured Data

Generally, databases should be produced in a mutually agreeable data exchange format, which may include production of reports generated from database rather than producing the entire database. To determine the data that is relevant to the document requests, a list of databases and systems used to manage relevant data should be provided with the following information:

i. Database Name ii. Type of Database iii. Software Platform iv. Software Version v. Business Purpose vi. Users vii. Size in Records viii. Size in Gigabytes ix. A List of Standard Reports x. Database Owner or Administrator's Name Upon review of the list, the Parties agree to meet and confer regarding the data to be produced from each source, if any, and the form(s) of the production thereof.

V. PRODUCTION SPECIFICATIONS

A. All Deliveries

Productions may be delivered either via encrypted physical media or via secure electronic download, or as otherwise agreed by the Parties.

All file paths should be relative.

Data to be encrypted and the decryption key should be provided prior to the delivery of the physical media.

An electronic version of the cover letter should be included. The decryption key should not be contained in the cover letter accompanying the physical media.

B. Physical Delivery

Productions that are delivered via physical media should be self-contained and not require that multiple discs or drives be combined after delivery.

The disc or drive should be clearly labeled with the following information: • Date of the production • Producing Party • Production Regarding • Production Volume • Bates Range • Number of Records

C. Electronic Delivery

The production should be announced via e-mail and made available for immediate download upon receipt of the e-mail. Delivery should be via a secure file transfer (SFT) system, or a password protected link. Productions made via insecure file transfer sites or sent via email may be rejected.

Electronic deliveries must remain downloadable for seven days after the production date or until the production has been downloaded and confirmed to be complete.

APPENDIX A(I)

Appendix A(1) — ESI Protocol

1. Scope. The Parties agree that each producing Party is best situated to evaluate the procedures, methodologies, and technologies appropriate for preservation, collection, and review of their own paper documents and electronically stored information (together with paper documents, "ESI"). Accordingly, this Protocol shall govern only the actual production of paper documents and ESI and shall in no way afb00ect the Parties' respective rights and obligations concerning the preservation, collection, and review of ESL All Parties preserve their attorney-client privileges and other privileges, and there is no intent by this Protocol, or the production of documents pursuant to this Protocol, to in any way waive or weaken these privileges. Nothing in this Protocol shall limit the Parties' respective rights and obligations concerning confidential, proprietary or private information, with respect to which they may make such agreements or stipulations as they see fit, subject to applicable law. All documents produced pursuant to this Protocol are fully protected and covered by the Parties' confidentiality agreements, and orders of the Court, as well as any clawback agreements, and protective order(s) of the Court effectuating the same.

2. Hard Copy Paper Documents. Hard copy paper documents shall be scanned and, to the extent reasonably practicable, produced in the manner in which those documents were kept in the ordinary course of business. Where hard copy paper documents have "post-it notes," tabs, or other labels, the information on the label shall be scanned and produced to the extent reasonably practicable. The Parties will utilize reasonable best efforts to ensure that hard copy scanned paper documents are produced in a manner that maintains the physical unitization of documents.

3. Images. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 4, below, all documents that are produced will be produced as images. Images will be produced as Single Page Group IV, 300 DPI, black and white TIFF images named as the beginning Bates number. To the extent that a party believes that any ESI should be produced in color, as opposed to black and white, the parties shall meet and confer as to whether reproduction in color is necessary and appropriate. Page level Bates numbers will be branded in the lower right of the image and additional confidentiality legends applied to the lower left (if applicable). The following formatting will be applied to Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint documents:

a. Word documents will be imaged showing track changes and comments; b. Excel files with redactions will be imaged un-hiding any hidden cells, rows, columns, or sheets; and c. PowerPoint files will be imaged showing notes in Notes Pages.

If a Party determines in good faith that it needs a document, which has been produced as an image, to be produced in its native file format, the Party will submit a request for such native file to the producing Party, in writing, and the Parties will meet and confer in good faith to discuss the request. Such request to the producing Party shall include the Bates number of each imaged document that is requested in native file format.

4. Native Files. When available, native fiies will be produced for Excel documents that do not contain any redacted information. Native files will be produced for email messages (MSG format) unless: (1) the email message contains a redaction; (2) any attachment to the email message contains a redaction; or (3) the email contains a non-responsive attachment. Native files will be produced for all files that cannot be imaged (e.g. audio and video files). With the exception of email, when a native file is produced, the producing party will produce a placeholder (a single-page TIFF slip-sheet indicating that the native file was produced) along with the file itself in native format; and the name of the native file will be the Bates number of the corresponding slip-sheet. Email that is produced in native format will also include a TIFF image of the email as described in paragraph 3. The metadata load file that is included with a production shall include available native file link information for each native file that is produced.

5. Metadata. A standard Concordance delimited load file (.DAT), with field header information added as the first line of the file, will be provided with each production. The Parties are not required to produce metadata from any electronic document if metadata does not exist in the document or the metadata is not machine-extractable. Documents will be produced with related metadata (to the extent it exists) as described in Appendix B. DAT file delimiters:

a. Column delimiter: Default is ¶ (ANSI 182) b. Quote: Default isl þ (ANSI 254) c. Record delimiter: Default is ® (ANSI 174) d. Multi-value delimiter: Default is; (ANSI 059)

For redacted documents, metadata fields must be produced only to the extent such fields will not disclose redacted information.

6. Image Cross Reference. A standard Opticon (.OPT) file will be provided with each production that contains imaged documents.

7. Text. Document level text files (.TXT) will be provided for each document produced. Text files will be named the first Bates number of the respective document. Extracted text will be provided when it exists for non-redacted documents. When extracted text is provided for an email, the email header information must appear in the extracted text. OCR text will be provided for documents when no extracted text exists, when the document is redacted, and for all PDF documents. A text load file (LST) will be provided to load the text from the TXT files into a review platform.

8. Encoding Format. TXT, DAT, OPT, and LST files will be provided in ANSI encoding.

9. Deduplication. ESI will be deduplicated across custodians (i.e. global deduplication) following industry-standard deduplication algorithms. An acceptable method, such as the MD5 hash format, shall be used for any deduplication. Additional custodians who had a copy prior to deduplication, such as email recipients, copyees, or blind copyees, • will be populated in the "DupCustodian_w_Orig" metadata field referenced in Appendix B.

10. Document Families. Whenever a document is produced, the entire corresponding family of documents (i.e. parent and all children) will be produced, except to the extent any member of the family is withheld because of privilege or confidentiality. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an email message is produced in response to a discovery request or a subpoena, then non-responsive attachments to the email are not required to be produced. If a family member is withheld for any reason then that document should be replaced by a placeholder identifying that it has been withheld. Families of documents will be produced with a continuous Bates range. Child documents will refer to their corresponding parent document via the "Production Bates — Attach Begin" metadata field referenced in Appendix B.

11. Email Threading. For emails, in addition to de-duplication across custodians, thread de-duplication may be applied prior to production. Thread de-duplication allows emails that are wholly contained in a later, surviving email, with all of the recipients and attachments contained, to be identified and suppressed from production. An email is only removed from production if 100% of the message body is contained, all addresses are included, and all attachments are included in a later email that is produced. To facilitate a receiving Party's use of email threading:

a. When extracted text is provided for an email, the email header information must appear in the extracted text; and b. The Conversation Topic Index and Parent ID metadata fields referenced in Appendix B must be provided for all emails produced as images.

12. Voicemails, Text Messages, and Smartphone ESI. Production requests for these forms of ESI shall only be propounded for specific issues, rather than general discovery. In addition, discovery of this information shall be phased and initially limited to three (3) custodians. Production requests for these forms of ESI shall identify the custodian, search terms, and timeframe. Indiscriminate terms, such as the Party's name, are inappropriate unless combined with narrowing search criteria that sufficiently reduce the risk of overproduction. The Parties shall cooperate to identify the proper custodians, proper search terms and proper timeframe. Requests for additional custodians, search terms and timeframes shall only be discussed by the Parties after the initial phased production and only upon showing a distinct need.

13. Redactions. Redactions on images shall be made with white boxes and contain black text that reasonably describes the nature of the asserted privilege or confidential information such as, for example, "Attorney-Client Privilege," "Work Product Privilege," "PPI" (Protected Personal Information), "PHI" (Protected Health Information, or "NRI" (Non-Responsive Information). If a Party redacts a document based on more than one claim of privilege or confidentiality, then the text that appears on the redaction need only describe the nature of one of the claims of privilege or confidentiality, but the corresponding entry in a privilege log must state all claims of privilege and confidentiality. For example, and without limiting the foregoing, if a Party claims that redacted text is protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work product privilege, then the text that appears on the redaction on the face of the document may state only "Attorney-Client Privilege," but the corresponding entry in a privilege log must state both "Attorney-Client Privilege" and "Work Product Privilege." In addition to redactions based on claims of privilege and confidentiality, the Parties may redact all non-responsive information.

14. De-Nisting of ESI. The Parties may remove operating system files and program files with the assistance of their respective information technology vendors or agents prior to conducting searches of data in accordance with the National Software Reference Library De-Nisting Process.

15. Third-Party Software. To the extent that documents produced cannot be rendered or viewed without the use of proprietary third-party software, the Parties shall meet and confer to minimize any expense or burden associated with the production of such documents in an acceptable format, including issues as may arise with respect to obtaining access to any such software and operating manuals which are the property of a third party.

a. If a producing Party discloses information that the Party thereafter claims to be privileged or confidential ("Disclosed Protected Information"), the disclosure of the Disclosed Protected Information shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver or forfeiture of any claim of privilege or confidentiality that the Party would otherwise be entitled to assert with respect to the Disclosed Protected Information and its subject matter in this litigation, any investigation, or any other federal, state, or administrative proceeding. b. The producing Party may assert in writing any privilege or claim of confidentiality with respect to the Disclosed Protected Information. The receiving Parties must—unless they contest the claim of privilege or confidentiality for each document in the Disclosed Protected Information—within five (5) business days of receipt of that writing, (i) return or destroy all copies of the Disclosed Protected Information, and (ii) sequester the Disclosed Protected Information and (iii) provide a written notification to the producing Party that all of the Disclosed Protected Information has been sequestered, returned or destroyed. Within five (5) business days of receipt of the notification that the Disclosed Protected Information has been sequestered, returned or destroyed, the producing Party must provide a privilege log with respect to the Disclosed Protected Information to the receiving Parties. The Parties may stipulate in writing to extend the time periods set forth in this sub-paragraph. c. If a receiving Party contests the claim of privilege or confidentiality for Disclosed Protected Information, the receiving Party may not disclose any of the Disclosed Protected Information, except under seal to a court of law, until the resolution of the objection. Pending such resolution, the receiving Party must sequester the Disclosed Protected Information and not use the Disclosed Protected Information or disclose it to any person other than as required by law. d. Disclosed Protected Information that is sought to be reclaimed by a producing Party shall not be used as grounds by any other Party or third party to argue that any waiver of privilege or protection has occurred by virtue of its production. e. The producing Party retains the burden of establishing the privileged or protected nature of the Disclosed Protected Information.

17. Reservation of Rights. Nothing contained herein is intended to create a precedent for, or to constitute a waiver or relinquishment of, any Party's objections or arguments pertaining to any potential future productions of ESL Nothing contained herein constitutes a waiver of any Party's rights or obligations under any law, including but not limited to laws regarding any matter or information that is or may be claimed to be privileged, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise personal or private.

18. Entire Agreement/Modification. This Protocol contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the production of ESI, and any statement, promise, or inducement made by either Party not set forth herein shall be of no effect, nor shall it be used in construing the terms of this Protocol. This Protocol may not be modified or amended except in writing signed by all Parties. Court approval is not required to modify or amend this Protocol, provided that such modification or amendment is in writing signed by all Parties.

19. Relief from this Protocol. Any Party may request relief from any obligation set forth in this Protocol. All such requests shall be in writing and submitted to the Court for consideration, with a copy of the request served to all Parties via email and U.S. mail. Any Party may oppose any request for relief by submitting a written opposition to the Court, with a copy of the opposition served to all Parties via email and U.S. mail within five (5) days of service of the request for relief.

20. Cost Shifting. Each Party expressly reserves the right to petition the Court to shift the cost of the production of ESI to the requesting Party.

APPENDIX A(2)

Appendix A(2) — Metadata Fields

Field Description Production Volume Production volume name. Production — Begbates Beginning bates number of document. Production — Endbates Ending bates number of document. Production Bates — Attach Beginning bates number of attached documents. Begin Production Bates — Attach Ending bates number of attached documents. End MD5 Hash MD5 hash value of native file. Application Program commonly used to access the record. Extension File extension. File Name File name without the file path. Time Zone Field Time zone at which record was collected. File Size (bytes) Size of file in kilobytes. Relativity Image Count Number of pages imaged. Custodian Person, device, or organization in possession of the record at the time of collection. DupCustodian_w_Orig Name(s) of custodian(s) with exact copy of file before deduplication. Created Date Date an edoc (loose file) was created. Created Time Time edoc (loose file) was created. Last Modified Date Date edoc (loose file) was last modified. Last Modified Time Time edoc (loose file) was last modified. App Created Date Date email attachment was created. App Created Time Time email attachment was created. App Last Modified Date Date email attachment was last modified. App Last Modified Time Time email attachment was last modified. Subject Subject field of email. From (Name) Sender of email. Sent To The "to" addressee(s) of email. CC The carbon copy addressee(s) of email. BCC The blind carbon copy addressee(s) of email. Sent Date Date email was sent. Sent Time Time email was sent. Received Date Date email was received. Received Time Time email was received. Conversation Topic Index Unique identifier assigned to email chain by (CTOPICINDEX) Microsoft Outlook. Parent ID Unique identifier assigned to a child attachment's parent email. Author Last editor of edoc (attachments/loose files) either inputted manually by author or through a preference setting in file properties. Title Title of edoc (attachments/loose files) either inputted manually by last editor or through a preference setting in file properties. Native File Link This field will contain the full path on the production media to any native files being produced. Internet Header Section of the email message populated with source and destination information. It sometimes includes Sender IP Address, and Transit server information. Often includes Sender/Recipient, subject, date-stamps, message ID and more based on the originating Mail User Agent. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re FLINT WATER CASES Case No. 5:17-cv-10444-JEL-MKM Marlana Sirls et al. Plaintiffs Case No. 5:17-cv-10342-JEL-EAS vs. Governor Richard Snyder et al., Defendants

NOTICE OF NON-PARTIES AT FAULT

NOW COME the Defendants, [Name of Party], and hereby file their Notice of Non-Parties at Fault in this matter pursuant to MCR 2.112(K) and the Second Amended Case Management Order in the In Re Flint Water Cases, Case No. 5:17-cv-10444. It is appropriate to file a notice of nonparties at fault in this Court where Plaintiffs have pled a variety of state law tort claims.

In accordance with the Court's Second Amended Case Management Order, [Name of Party] incorporates and adopts in full its Notice of Non-Parties at Fault and all supplements to that notice filed in Walters v. Flint, Case No. 5:17-cv-10164 [ECF ___ ] as if it were set forth at length herein.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re FLINT WATER CASES Civil Action No. 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM (consolidated) Hon. Judith E. Levy Mag. Mona K. Majzoub

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER

WHEREAS parties to one or more of these federal Flint Water Cases may seek discovery or disclosure of documents, information, or other materials that contain non-public, confidential, competitively sensitive, or proprietary information (hereinafter called "Confidential Material") of other parties or of non-parties;

WHEREAS a confidentiality order should be entered at this time to limit appropriately the use and disclosure that may be made of such Confidential Material;

WHEREAS the following provisions will appropriately balance the need for protection of Confidential Material with the public interest in access to information relevant to litigation arising out of alleged contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply that began in 2014; and

WHEREAS the Court has found based on the parties' submissions and its own experience to date with the federal Flint Water cases, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and E.D. Mich. L.R. 26.4, that there is good cause for entry of a confidentiality order in the form proposed to protect the parties' legitimate privacy and confidentiality interests as well as, potentially, those of non-parties, and also to simplify and expedite proceedings in this complex litigation, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Limitation on Use of Protected Material.

All documents, other materials, and information that are produced in response to discovery requests served in any of the federal Flint Water Cases, or in response to court orders entered in any of the federal Flint Water Cases, or in any of the federal Flint Water Cases pursuant to any disclosure provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court, or by stipulation in any of the federal Flint Water Cases, and which is designated in accordance with this Order as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" (hereinafter called "Protected Material") shall be used solely for the prosecution or defense of the federal Flint Water Cases, or for the prosecution or defense of Flint Water Cases pending in the Genesee County Circuit Court and consolidated for pretrial handling under that court's Docket No. 17-1086646-NO or in the Michigan Court of Claims (hereinafter called the "State Flint Water Cases"), except to the extent the document, other material, or information already is or later becomes publicly available without any intentional or unintentional violation of this Order having contributed to its public availability. No party or non-party bound by this Order may designate documents, other materials, and information as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" unless the party or non-party in good faith believes the document, other material, or information satisfies the requirements for those designations that are described in ¶¶ 5, 6, or 7 of this Order.

2. Purpose of the Order.

To preserve the legitimate privacy and confidentiality interests of parties and non-parties who produce Protected Material, this Order establishes procedures for disclosing Protected Material to parties in federal Flint Water Cases and to certain other persons to whom disclosure may be necessary for proper and efficient prosecution or defense of federal Flint Water Cases; imposes obligations on such persons as are appropriate to protect the Protected Material from use or disclosure for purposes other than prosecution or defense of these federal Flint Water Cases or of State Flint Water Cases; and prescribes a procedure by which persons who in good faith believe specific Protected Materials do not deserve the protection or level of protection they are designated to receive may challenge such designations.

3. Materials Covered.

This Order applies to all Confidential Material that is produced in response to discovery requests served in any of the federal Flint Water Cases, or in response to court orders entered in any of the federal Flint Water Cases, or in any of the federal Flint Water Cases pursuant to any disclosure provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court, or by stipulation in any of the federal Flint Water Cases. It applies to such Confidential Material whether the Confidential Material is a document, a deposition or other out-of-court testimony, a multimedia audio/visual file such as a voice or video recording, a discovery response, or electronically stored information (hereinafter called "ESI"); and it shall apply not only to the document, transcript, multimedia audio/visual file, discovery response, or ESI that is actually produced, but also to the information in it.

4. Persons Bound.

This Order is binding on all parties to federal Flint Water Cases as well as their respective attorneys, agents, representatives, officers, and employees and others identified elsewhere in this Order. It is also binding on non-parties to the action to the extent such non-parties are made subject to the Order by ¶¶ 8(c)(ii) or 23 or have executed a written agreement to be bound substantially in the form attached to this Order as Exhibit A or Exhibit B. Nothing in this Order shall limit the use or disclosure of Protected Material by the party or other person who produces it, but disclosure by that party or other person of Protected Material in a way that causes it to become public will cause it to lose its protection under this Order. "Person," as used in this Order, means not only natural persons but also all business entities, government entities, and institutions and associations of all kinds. As used in this Order, "producing party" means any party or other person that designates Protected Material pursuant to this Order.

5. Requirements for Designation as "Confidential."

The designation "Confidential" shall be used only with respect to Confidential Material that the producing party believes, in good faith: (a) contains private, non-public, confidential, competitively-sensitive, or proprietary information that is not readily ascertainable through lawful means by the public, (b) that if disclosed publicly would likely cause oppression, competitive disadvantage, infringement of privacy rights established by statute or regulation, or infringement of confidentiality requirements established by statute or regulation with respect to government purchasing or other operations, or (c) that if used for purposes other than those authorized by this Order could cause oppression or competitive disadvantage.

6. Requirements for Designation as "Highly Confidential — Attorneys" Eyes Only."

The designation "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be used only with respect to Confidential Material that meets the requirements of ¶ 5 of this Order and, in addition, is highly sensitive proprietary information for which, in practical terms, there is substantial reason to believe the protections prescribed by this Order for Protected Material designated only "Confidential" will be inadequate to prevent use of the Protected Material for commercial purposes not permitted by this Order. For illustrative purposes only, and without intending or attempting to be comprehensive, such material might include current financial or business planning information; recent, current, and projected future financial performance data; recent and current customer lists; recent, current, and future marketing plans; planning information for future products and services; and projected future business development plans and strategies.

7. Parties' Designation of Protected Material Produced by Others. Any party may designate "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential —

Attorneys' Eyes Only" Confidential Material produced by another party or by a non-party if the Confidential Material (a) originated from the designating party or was generated on behalf of the designating party, or (b) contains Confidential Material of the designating party, and (c) meets the requirements of ¶¶ 5 or 6. In the event a party makes such a designation, the designating party shall be deemed the producing party for purposes of this Order. Failure to designate Confidential Material produced by another party or a non-party pursuant to this paragraph at or before the time such Confidential Material is produced shall not constitute a waiver of the designating party's right to make such a designation at a later time, so long as the designation is made at the earliest practical time.

8. Manner of Designating Protected Material.

Confidential Material may be designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" in the following ways:

(a) A producing party may designate documents that are produced in hard copy or in electronic copies by marking the first page and each subsequent page that contains Confidential Material with, as appropriate, the legend "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only." The appropriate designation shall, to the extent practical, be placed on the document so as not to obscure any information contained in the document and close to any Bates number assigned to the document by the producing party. Pages of a document that do not meet the standards of ¶¶ 5 or 6 of this Order, except for the first page of the document, shall not be marked as described in this paragraph.

(b) A producing party may designate written discovery responses or written disclosures that are made pursuant to court order or provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or this Court's local rules by marking the first page and each subsequent page that contains Confidential Material with, as appropriate, the legend "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only." Unless it is impractical to do so, specific responses or disclosures containing Confidential Material shall be separated from responses that contain only non-confidential material and shall be collected in a separate addendum to the set of responses or disclosure, so that to the extent possible responses or disclosures that do not deserve the protection of this Order may be freely and easily used and disclosed. When a single page marked "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" contains responses that satisfy the requirements for one of those designations but also responses that do not satisfy those requirements, the non-confidential responses shall be conspicuously identified as non-confidential.

(c) (i) In the case of depositions, counsel for a producing party may designate testimony as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" by identifying it as such on the record at or about the time the testimony is given. With respect to deposition exhibits, counsel for a producing party may designate such exhibits, or portions of them, as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys Eyes' Only" by identifying them as such on the record at or before the conclusion of the deposition, provided, however, that no such designation need be made with respect to exhibits that have previously been marked in a manner to make them Protected Material.

(ii) In the case of depositions, a non-party witness who is not an employee of a party, or the witness's attorney, may designate testimony or exhibits as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" in the same manner described in subparagraph (c)(i). But in all cases where such designation is made by a non-party witness or the witness's attorney, both the witness and his or her attorney shall be deemed to have accepted, by making the designation, all obligations created by this Order.

(iii) If no testimony is designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" at a deposition, the deposition testimony and the transcript of it shall be presumed not to be Protected Material unless, at or before the close of the day's testimony, a producing party's attorney of record states on the record, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, the party's or the attorney's good faith belief that testimony given at the deposition is likely to be protectable as "Confidential" matter, "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" matter, or both in accordance with the standards of ¶¶ 5 and 6 of this Order. If such an on-the-record-statement is made, all of the deposition testimony and the entire transcript shall be accorded the highest level of protection identified by such attorney for a period of fifteen (15) calendar days after the final transcript (that is to say, not a draft transcript) is received by or becomes available to attorneys who made or joined in the statement. If, before expiration of such 15-day period, any attorneys who made or joined in the statement notify counsel of record for all other parties to the actions in which the deposition was taken of the pages and lines of deposition testimony that are "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only," then those pages and lines, but no other pages and lines, shall remain subject to the protection of this Order after the 15-day period has ended.

(iv) All transcripts of depositions at which testimony has been designated in accordance with subparagraph (c)(i) or (c)(ii) as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be marked by the court reporter on the cover page with one or both of those designations and each page on which testimony appears that was identified as protectable at the deposition shall likewise be marked with one or both of those designations; but in making use of the deposition testimony and transcript the persons bound by this Order shall be limited in their use only of the testimony and portions of the transcript that was identified as protectable at the deposition.

(v) All transcripts of depositions at which the statement described in subparagraph (c)(iii) was made shall be marked by the court reporter on the cover page with one or both of those designations. In the event no written designation of specific protectable testimony is provided in accordance with subparagraph (c)(iii), persons bound by this Order may obliterate the designations placed on the cover page. In the event a written designation of specific protectable testimony is provided in accordance with subparagraph (c)(iii), all persons bound by this Order shall treat those pages and lines as required by this Order for Protected Material.

(vi) Deposition exhibits designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be marked as provided in ¶ 8(a).

(vii) If testimony taken at an audiovisually-recorded deposition is designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only," the videocassette, other videotape container, or disk on which the deposition was recorded shall be marked by affixing a label to it with the appropriate designation.

(d) To the extent protectable information is produced in a form rendering it impractical to label (including electronically stored information produced on electronic, magnetic, or other computer-readable media), the producing party may designate such information "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" by cover letter or by affixing to the media containing the protectable information a label containing the appropriate legend. If a person bound by this Order reduces computerized information that has been so designated to hard-copy form, that person shall mark the hard-copy form in the manner described in ¶ 8(a). Whenever any "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" computerized material is copied into another form, the person copying the material shall also mark those forms in the manner described in this ¶ 8.

(e) To the extent any person bound by this Order other than the producing party creates, develops, or otherwise establishes on any digital or analog machine-readable device, recording media, computers, discs, networks or tapes, or maintains for review on any electronic system material that contains information designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" that person or its counsel shall take all necessary measures to assure that access to the electronic system and media containing such information is restricted to those persons who, by the terms of this Order, are permitted to have access to it.

(f) Documents, materials, and other information that are made available for inspection only shall be treated as "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" during the inspection. To the extent copies of any such materials are later provided to parties or to non-parties bound by this Order, however, the copies provided shall be marked in accordance with ¶¶ 8(a)-(d) of this Order and shall thereafter be accorded only such protection as provided by this Order for Protected Materials so marked.

9. Filing Protected Material.

(a) In connection with any court filing in which a party intends to reveal or submit Protected Material, the filing party shall initially file a redacted version omitting the Protected Material, and shall serve both the redacted and an unredacted copy of the filing (hereinafter called "unredacted filing") on counsel of record for all parties and the Court. If the court filing includes Protected Material designated by a non-party pursuant to this Order, the filing party will also serve on that non-party a copy of the filing with that non-party's Protected Material unredacted. Notwithstanding the above, if the producing party is also the filing party, it may elect to not file the designated material redacted or under seal.

(b) Upon service of such unredacted filing, the producing party shall have fourteen (14) days to file a further motion to seal the Protected Material contained in the unredacted filing, identifying (in a manner that does not disclose the substance of the Protected Material) the specific pages, lines, words, and content of such filing that such party contends meet the standard for sealing from public view under applicable law. The motion shall be submitted to the Court via email or hard copy and served on counsel of record for all parties. The parties will have seven (7) days from the date the sealing motion is served to file a response. The response shall be submitted to the Court via email or hard copy and served on counsel of record for all parties. In the event no such motion to seal is filed, the original filing party shall re-file the complete, unredacted motion in the public record.

(c) If a producing party does file a motion to seal all of the Protected Material in the unredacted filing, then no public filing of the Protected Material will be made unless ordered by the Court.

(d) If the producing party files a motion seeking to seal some, but not all, of the Protected Material in the unredacted filing, then the producing party shall be responsible for promptly providing the filing party with a version of the original filing in PDF format redacted so as to omit only the Protected Material that is the subject of its motion to seal, and the original filing party will file a "Modified Redacted Version" of the original redacted filing.

(e) If the Court grants some, but not all, of the relief requested by producing party in its motion to seal, then the producing party shall be responsible for promptly providing an "Amended Redacted Version" of the redacted filing or the Modified Redacted Version in Adobe PDF format reflecting the Court's ruling, for filing by the original filing party.

10. Filing of Protected Material Under Seal.

(a) This Order does not itself authorize the filing of any documents under seal. Documents may be sealed only if authorized by a separate order of the Court. A party seeking to file under seal any paper or other matter must file and serve a motion that sets forth: (i) the authority for sealing; (ii) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the reason that a means other than sealing is not available or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; and (v) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal. See E.D. Mich. L.R. 5.3. The movant shall not file or otherwise tender to the Clerk any item proposed for sealing unless the Court has granted the motion. If a motion to seal is granted, the documents to be filed under seal shall, if possible, be filed electronically by the movant.

11. Use of Protected Material.

(a) Protected Material may only be used for the purpose of prosecuting or defending the federal Flint Water Cases and the State Flint Water Cases. It may not be used for any business, competitive, personal, private, or political purpose. Protected Material may not be sold or offered for sale. Protected Material may not be used for marketing, promotional, or advertising purposes.

(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Order limits the use a producing party may make of its own Confidential Material. A producing party's use of its Confidential Material in a way that causes it to become public, however, shall constitute a waiver of any earlier designation that party made of the Confidential Material as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only."

(c) Subject to the provisions of ¶ 11(d) of this Order, nothing in this Order limits the use any party may make of Protected Material at trial or at any evidentiary hearing in a federal Flint Water Case or in a State Flint Water Case. The protection, if any, to be accorded to evidence offered at trial or at an evidentiary hearing and to counsels' and witnesses' references to such evidence at trials and evidentiary hearings shall be determined by the judicial officer presiding over the trial or evidentiary hearing.

(d) Any party who intends to disclose Protected Material at a public court proceeding shall make its best efforts to inform the Court and the producing party at least five (5) business days in advance of the anticipated disclosure date of the intended disclosure, but in any event shall provide sufficient advance notice to the Court and to the producing party to permit the Court to decide, before any disclosure has been made, what, if any, orders it should enter to protect the Protected Material from inappropriate use or disclosure.

(e) A producing party may designate portions of transcripts of trials and evidentiary hearings as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" by providing written notice to counsel of record for all parties of the designation and of the pages and lines subject to the designation. Such written notice must be provided no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the final transcript (that is to say, not a draft transcript) has been completed by the court reporter or other transcriptionist.

(f) Nothing in this Order is intended to prevent counsel for any party from rendering advice to his or her client with respect to the federal Flint Water Cases or the State Flint Water Cases or, in rendering such advice, from relying upon his or her examination and understanding of Protected Material; but in rendering such advice, counsel shall not disclose Protected Material to any person to whom disclosure is not permitted by this Order.

12. Disclosure of Confidential Information.

(a) Counsel of record for all parties and for non-parties bound by this Order are responsible for taking reasonable measures consistent with this Order to control access to and distribution of Protected Material designated "Confidential" that they receive.

(b) Access to Protected Material designated "Confidential" shall be limited to:

(i) This Court, the Genesee County Circuit Court, and the Michigan Court of Claims, clerks and other personnel of this Court, the Genesee County Circuit Court, and the Michigan Court of Claims, jurors, alternate jurors, and persons engaged in recording, taking, or transcribing proceedings at depositions, trials, and hearings in a federal Flint Water Case or a State Flint Water Case.

(ii) Appellate courts handling appeals from orders or judgments entered in federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water cases, clerks and other personnel of such appellate courts, and persons engaged in recording, taking, or transcribing proceedings in such appeals.

(iii) Mediators and settlement masters appointed by the Court or retained by parties to federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases, except that if a party is not participating in the mediation or other settlement proceedings being conducted by the mediator or other settlement master, Protected Material designated by that party may not be disclosed to the mediator or other settlement master unless and until the mediator or other settlement master has executed a written agreement in the form attached to this Order as Exhibit A.

(iv) Subject to ¶ 12(c), counsel of record for parties in the federal Flint Water Cases and State Flint Water Cases, as well as members of such counsel-of-record's firms, associates at such firms, and paralegals, investigative employees, technical employees, and secretarial and clerical employees of those firms who are assisting counsel of record with a federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case and who have a need for access to Protected Materials to provide such assistance adequately.

(v) Subject to ¶ 12(c), attorneys employed in parties' in-house legal departments, as well as paralegals, investigative employees, technical employees, and secretarial and clerical employees of those parties who are assisting in-house counsel with a federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case and who have a need for access to Protected Materials to provide such assistance adequately.

(vi) Subject to ¶ 12(c), insurers who may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment against a defendant in a federal Flint Water Case or a State Flint Water Case or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy such a judgment, as well as counsel for any such defendant and any such insurer as may be actually engaged in addressing coverage issues related to Flint Water Cases and who have a need for access to Protected Materials to provide their professional services adequately.

(vii) Subject to ¶ 12(c), photocopying, document storage, data processing, document review, graphic production, jury research or trial management firms retained by parties or their counsel of record to assist them with federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases and who have a need for access to Protected Materials to provide such assistance adequately.

(viii) Subject to ¶ 12(c), contract attorneys and paralegals retained by parties' counsel of record to assist them with federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases and who have a need for access to Protected Materials to provide such assistance adequately.

(ix) Subject to ¶ 12(c), experts, consultants, and expert consulting firms retained by counsel of record in connection with a federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case to the extent reasonably necessary to enable the expert, consultant, or expert consulting firm to advise counsel of record with respect to federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases, to prepare one or more written reports as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a), or to testify orally or in writing in a federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case. Disclosures authorized under this subparagraph, however, shall be made only to the individual expert or consultant retained by the party or to such members, partners, independent contractors, other support personnel, or employees of the individual expert's or consultant's consulting firm who have a need for access to Protected Materials to perform the engagement adequately (hereinafter called "Expert Personnel"). The individual expert or consultant retained by the party or Expert Personnel may use Protected Material solely in connection with their work on federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases. The individual expert or consultant and all Expert Personnel must, before receiving Protected Material, execute a Written Assurance in the form attached to this Order as Exhibit A. Expert Personnel may not include any person who, since January 1, 2017, has been an officer, director, or employee of any party in a federal Flint Water Case or in a State Flint Water Case other than of the party who retains the expert, consultant, or consulting firm.

(x) In addition to employees in a party's in-house legal department, current employees of the party who have personal knowledge with respect to the information contained in the Protected Material and: (i) with respect to the Veolia, LAN, and Rowe Parties and Plaintiffs, no more than three officers, directors, or employees who are charged with responsibility for making decisions dealing directly with the party's prosecution, defense, or resolution of federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases; and (ii) with respect to the Government Parties, officers, elected officials, or employees who are charged with responsibility for making decisions dealing directly with the party's prosecution, defense, or resolution of federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases; provided that the requirements of ¶ 14(a) of this Order are satisfied.

(xi) Parties who are natural persons, provided that the requirements of ¶ 14(a) of this Order are satisfied.

(xii) Any person who authored or is identified as a former recipient of the particular Protected Material; or is or formerly was a custodian of the particular Protected Material; or is a current employee of the party or non-party who designated the particular Protected Material for protection; or is a witness testifying at a deposition, or at trial, or at an evidentiary hearing to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for proper prosecution or defense of a federal Flint Water Case or of a State Flint Water Case and whom counsel who makes the disclosure has a reasonable and good faith belief already is aware of the specific information contained in the Protected Material.

(xiii) Any other person to whom the producing party agrees in writing or on the record in advance of the disclosure, or whom the Court explicitly directs, may have access to the Protected Material.

(c) Some parties to State Flint Water Cases may be bound by this Order if they are also parties to one or more federal Flint Water Cases. To the extent parties to State Flint Water Cases are not bound by this Order, they may have access to Protected Material only after executing the written agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. Persons described in ¶ 12(b)(iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), or (ix) may have access to Protected Material only by executing the written agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, unless they are already bound by this Order by virtue of being employed by, retained by, or an insurer for a party to at least one federal Flint Water Case.

13. Disclosure of Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only Material.

(a) Counsel of record for all parties and for non-parties bound by this Order are responsible for taking reasonable measures consistent with this Order to control access to and distribution of Protected Material designated "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" that they receive.

(b) Access to Protected Material designated "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" shall be limited to:

(i) The persons identified in ¶ 12(b)(i)-(iv) and (vi)-(x), subject to ¶ 12(c).

(ii) In-house attorneys employed in the legal departments of parties, but only to the extent such in-house attorneys have a need to know the "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" material.

(iii) Any person who authored or is identified as a former recipient of the particular Protected Material; or is or formerly was a custodian of the particular Protected Material; or is a current employee of the party or non-party who designated the particular Protected Material for protection; or is a witness testifying at deposition, or at trial, or at an evidentiary hearing to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for proper prosecution or defense of a federal Flint Water Case or of a State Flint Water Case and whom counsel who makes the disclosure has a reasonable and good faith belief already is aware of the specific information contained in the Protected Material.

(iv) Any other person to whom the producing party agrees in writing or on the record in advance of the disclosure, or whom the Court explicitly directs, may have access to the Protected Material.

14. Notification of Confidentiality Order.

(a) Subject to the exceptions in ¶ 14(b), counsel of record for the parties shall be responsible for obtaining, before disclosing Protected Material, the written agreement to be bound by this Order of the person to whom the disclosure is to be made. The written agreement shall be in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A. The originals of all written agreements obtained by counsel of record for a party shall be kept by that attorney until final resolution of the federal Flint Water Cases and the State Flint Water Cases, whereupon copies shall be provided to counsel of record who request them; but the Court may order earlier disclosure of one or more such written agreements upon motion of any party supported by a showing of good cause for the earlier disclosure.

(b) The provisions of ¶ 14(a) do not apply to disclosures made to this Court, the Genesee County Circuit Court, the Michigan Court of Claims, clerks and other personnel of this Court, the Genesee County Circuit Court, or the Michigan Court of Claims, jurors, alternate jurors, persons engaged in recording, taking, or transcribing proceedings at depositions, trials, and hearings in a federal Flint Water Case or a State Flint Water Case, appellate courts handling appeals from orders or judgments entered in federal Flint Water Cases or State Flint Water Cases, clerks and other personnel of such appellate courts, or persons engaged in recording, taking, or transcribing proceedings in such appeals. The provisions of ¶ 14(a) do not apply to disclosures to testifying non-party witnesses who are not retained experts or consultants except to the extent provided in ¶ 14(c).

(c) Before Protected Material is disclosed to a non-party witness (who is not a retained expert or consultant) at a deposition, trial, or evidentiary hearing, the witness shall be shown a copy of this Order and asked to sign the written agreement of which a copy is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. If the witness signs the agreement, the original signed agreement shall be marked as an exhibit to his or her testimony, a copy of the signed agreement shall be provided to the witness at or before the end of the testimony, and the witness shall be bound by this Order. If the witness refuses to sign the agreement, his or her testimony shall proceed unless the Court orders upon motion of any interested party that it not be taken or that it be taken only with respect to matter that is not Protected Material. In the event the testimony of a witness who refuses to sign the agreement of which a copy is annexed hereto as Exhibit A, no copies of Protected Material that are marked as exhibits to the testimony or shown to the witness in connection with his or her testimony shall be provided to or shown to the witness outside the courtroom or deposition room.

15. Challenges to Designations of Protected Material

(a) A party need not challenge the appropriateness of a "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" designation at the time the designation is made, and failure to do so does not prevent a later challenge to the appropriateness of the designation. Any challenge must be made, however, no later than the deadline for completion of fact discovery in the action in which the designation was made or sixty (60) days after the designation was made, whichever is later.

(b) A party who objects to a designation of Protected Material made pursuant to this Order shall give written notice of its objections via e-mail to counsel of record for all parties and to any non-party who made such designation. The notice shall identify the challenged Protected Material by Bates number on an item-by-item basis unless the Protected Material cannot reasonably be identified in that fashion, except that if a party challenges a mass designation or extensive designations of substantially identical types of Protected Material the notice may describe with reasonable specificity the items being challenged and identify their Bates numbers by range. The notice shall include in concise but meaningful language the factual basis on which the challenge to each item is based. The interested parties and non-parties bound by this Order thereafter shall confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the objections by agreement to the extent they are able to do so. If the objection is not completely resolved within fourteen (14) days of transmission of the notice, the party challenging the designation may file with the Court, using the "Notice-Other" designation in ECF, a "Notice of Objection to Designation of Protected Material" which shall identify all Protected Materials that remain in dispute in the same manner as they were identified in the original notice and which shall indicate the degree of protection, if any, that each item should continue to receive; the designating party or non-party bound by this Order may within twelve (12) days thereafter file a memorandum in support of the designation it contends is appropriate; and the party challenging the designation may file a response within seven (7) days thereafter. Once a Notice of Objection to Designation of Protected Material has been filed, the party or non-party that made the designation shall bear the burden of showing good cause for the designation it advocates. If no memorandum is filed by the designating party or non-party supporting its designation, the Protected Material will be redesignated in the manner suggested in the Notice of Objection to Designation of Protected Material. If the designating party or non-party agrees to change the designation of any challenged Protected Material, that party or non-party shall send written notice of the change to counsel of record for all other parties.

(c) All Protected Materials shall continue to be treated according to their designation unless and until the Court orders otherwise or the designating party or non-party notifies all other parties that it has agreed to change the designation.

16. No Waiver of Objections.

Nothing in this order shall affect the right, if any, of a party or non-party to assert any objection to any discovery request or to any questions or proceedings at a deposition, trial, or evidentiary hearing; but no party or non-party shall be deemed to have waived an objection based on confidentiality to any discovery request or deposition question or proceeding if, in that person's judgment, the protection afforded by this Order adequately addresses the person's confidentiality concern. Nothing in this Order shall diminish the right of any party or non-party to withhold Protected Material on the basis of any legally cognizable privilege, or Fed. R. Div. P. 26(b)(3) or 26(b)(4), or the work product immunity.

17. Disposition of Protected Material.

(a) Subject to the provisions of ¶ 17(b) and (c), within sixty (60) days after final disposition of the last remaining federal Flint Water Case and the last remaining State Flint Water Case, including disposition of any appeal and subsequent remand, all parties and non-parties bound by this Order shall return to counsel of record for the respective producing parties or non-parties all Protected Material and all copies of such Protected Material, including among others all copies that were provided to experts and consultants for the returning party.

(b) In lieu of returning Protected Material and copies thereof in accordance with ¶ 17(a), any party or non-party bound by this Order may destroy and certify in writing that it has destroyed such materials.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of ¶ 17(a), parties to the federal Flint Water Cases and the State Flint Water Cases, as well as their counsel of record and their insurers, may retain copies of filings that were made in federal Flint Water Cases and State Flint Water Cases as well as correspondence and memoranda among themselves related to those cases; but any Protected Material contained in such documents must continue to be treated in accordance with this Order so long as it is neither returned nor destroyed.

18. Correction of Designations and Clawback of Protected Material.

(a) A party who fails to designate Confidential Material as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" at the time it produces it may correct its designation at a later time consistent with this paragraph, except that no such correction may be made with respect to items that have already been filed, or included in filings, in the public docket in any federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case.

(b) Any correction shall be made by means of a written notice of the correction or, if made orally, shall be confirmed in writing within three (3) days thereafter. The notice of correction shall be sent to counsel of record for all parties and shall be accompanied by substitute copies of each item, marked in accordance with ¶ 8 of this Order, as to which a new designation of "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" is being made. Any party receiving such a notice may, within fifteen (15) days after having received the notice, object to the late designation by sending written notice of its objection via e-mail to counsel of record for all other parties, stating in concise but meaningful fashion the basis for the objection.

(c) If no timely objection is interposed, all parties shall destroy or return to counsel of record for the producing party all previously received copies of the newly designated Protected Material, including copies that were supplied to experts and consultants retained by that party; except that no party is required to destroy or return transcripts or audiovisual recordings of depositions or other testimony.

(d) If an objection has been interposed in accordance with ¶ 18(b), the interested parties thereafter shall confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the objections by agreement to the extent they are able to do so. If the objection is not completely resolved, the producing party may file within fourteen (14) days of transmission of the written notice of objection a motion seeking to designate the items in accordance with its written notice of correction and parties opposing the late designation may file memoranda in opposition to the motion within twelve (12) days after it is filed. The party proposing the late designation shall bear the burden of establishing good cause for its allowance. Once a motion has been filed in accordance with this ¶ 18(d), items subject to the motion shall be treated as if they were Protected Material bearing the proposed designation until such time as the Court has ruled otherwise.

(e) The obligation to treat late-designated Protected Material in accordance with this Order is prospective only. Persons who reviewed late-designated Protected Material before the late designation became effective in accordance with this ¶ 18 shall, after receiving notice of the late designation, abide by the provisions of this Order in all future use and disclosures of the Protected Material.

19. Responsibilities with Respect to Improperly Disclosed Protected Material.

If a party, a party's counsel of record, or any other person bound by this Order discovers that he or she, or someone for whose conduct he or she is responsible, has disclosed Protected Material to a person who is not authorized under this Order to receive it, the party, counsel, or other person bound by this Order shall promptly notify counsel of record for the producing party of the unauthorized disclosure and shall promptly take all reasonable steps to retrieve the improperly disclosed Protected Material and to restore to it the protection contemplated by this Order. Nothing in this Order is intended to limit the right of any party or person to seek additional relief, if appropriate, against persons responsible for any improper disclosure.

20. Non-Application to Information from Other Sources.

(a) Nothing in this Order limits use or disclosure of documents, material, or information that are publicly available, except that if Protected Material becomes publicly available because of a violation of this Order the party or other person bound this Order who is responsible for the violation shall be subject to such sanctions for the violation as all interested parties may agree or the Court may determine are appropriate in the circumstances.

(b) Nothing in this Order limits use or disclosure of Confidential Material that a party or other person obtained from a person who is not bound by this Order and whom the party or other person obtaining it reasonably believed at the time was lawfully in possession of it.

21. Compliance Not an Admission.

Compliance with this Order is not an admission by any party or non-party that any particular document, other material, or information is or is not confidential, except that a party or non-party who designates a document, other material or information "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only" by such designation admits it meets the standards for such designation described in this Order. Compliance with this Order is not an admission by any party or non-party that any particular, document, other material, or information is or is not privileged, except that a party or non-party who asserts any privilege with respect to a document, other material, or information by such assertion admits that it is privileged. Compliance with this Order is not an admission by any party or non-party that any particular document, other material, or information is or is not discoverable or that any particular document, other material, or information is or is not admissible in evidence.

22. Non-Parties' Discovery Requests for Protected Material.

If any party receives a subpoena, other formal discovery request, or investigative demand, except for one issued in a federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case, that seeks Protected Material designated as such by someone else, the party must promptly inform the issuer of the subpoena, other discovery request, or investigative demand about this Order, provide the issuer with a copy of this Order, and notify counsel of record for all parties to the federal Flint Water Cases of the subpoena, other discovery request, or investigative demand. The notice to counsel of record for all parties shall be provided as soon as reasonably possible and, in any event, far enough in advance of the date specified in the subpoena, other discovery request, or investigative demand for disclosure of the Protected Material to permit other interested parties a reasonable opportunity to file such motions and take such other steps as they may deem appropriate to prevent or limit disclosure of the Protected Material before the disclosure occurs; and the party who received the subpoena, other discovery request, or investigative demand shall provide reasonable cooperation to the other interested parties in their efforts to prevent or limit such disclosure. Provided, however, that nothing in this Order requires any party or other person to violate any legal obligations created by any subpoena, other discovery request, or investigative demand.

23. Protection of Non-Parties.

Persons who are not party to any federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case may obtain the protection of this Order for Confidential Material they provide in response to discovery proceedings in any such Flint Water Case. Such persons may obtain the protection of this Order by executing a written agreement in the form attached to this Order as Exhibit B and by complying with the requirements of this Order for the designation, use, and disclosure of Protected Material.

24. Persons Bound and Continued Effectiveness.

This Order binds all parties to federal Flint Water Cases, their counsel of record, and other persons to the extent described in the order. It shall remain in effect until modified or terminated by further Court order. Nothing in this Order is to the prejudice of the right of any party or other person to move this Court for relief from any of its provisions, or to modify it (including without limitation to modify it to provide greater, lesser, or different protection for particular Confidential Material or to prevent disclosures to particular people), and nothing is to the prejudice of the right of any party or other person to move for additional protective orders. The provisions of this Order remain effective after final disposition of the federal Flint Water Cases and the State Flint Water Cases. This Court retains jurisdiction after final disposition of the federal Flint Water Cases for the purpose of enforcing this Order.

25. Application to New Plaintiffs and Defendants.

(a) When counsel of record for a plaintiff in an existing federal Flint >Water Case commences suit on behalf of a new plaintiff in a federal Flint Water Case, the new plaintiff shall file at the same time as the complaint a notice either that the new plaintiff agrees to be bound by this Confidentiality Order (or by such amended Confidentiality Order as may be effective on the date the plaintiff's complaint is filed) or that the new plaintiff does not agree to be so bound. A copy of the notice shall be served along with the summons and complaint. Any plaintiff who files such a notice agreeing to be bound shall from that date forward be bound by and have the benefits of this Order.

(b) If a plaintiff who is not represented by counsel of record for an existing plaintiff in a federal Flint Water Case files an action in this Court arising out of alleged contamination of the City of Flint municipal water supply, that plaintiff and that plaintiff's counsel shall be bound by this Order unless, within fourteen (14) calendar days after filing the complaint or such longer time as the Court may allow, that plaintiff moves for relief from the order. Neither that plaintiff nor its counsel shall be entitled to receive any Protected Material until that plaintiff has either obtained relief from this Order by the Court or has filed its assent to be bound by this Order (or by such amended Confidentiality Order as may be effective on the date the plaintiff files its assent).

(c) Subject to ¶ 25(d), any person who is not already a party to a federal Flint Water Case but who in the future becomes a defendant may file at the time of its first appearance a notice either agreeing to be bound by this Order or not agreeing to be bound by it. Any defendant who files such a notice agreeing to be bound shall from that date forward be bound by and have the benefits of this Order. Any new defendant who does not agree to be bound by this Order, and that defendant's counsel, shall be bound by this Order unless, within fourteen (14) calendar days after first appearing or such longer time as the Court may allow, that defendant moves for relief from the order. Neither that defendant nor its counsel shall be entitled to receive any Protected Material until that defendant has either obtained relief from this Order by the Court or has filed its assent to be bound by this Order (or by such amended Confidentiality Order as may be effective on the date the defendant files its assent).

(d) No filing required by ¶ 25(c) shall constitute a waiver of any defendant's defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or immunity.

26. Non-Waiver.

Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a determination by the Court, or as an admission by any party or non-party, that any parent or affiliate of a party is subject to personal jurisdiction in the Eastern District of Michigan or that it is subject to service of process or to discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Assent to or compliance with this Order does not constitute a waiver any defense, of any immunity, or of any claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Judith E. Levy Dated: December 19, 2017 JUDITH E. LEVY Ann Arbor, Michigan United States District Judge.

EXHIBIT A

On behalf of _______________________________________ [NAME OF ORGANIZATION], I, ______________________________ [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL] certify (i) that I understand that documents, other materials, and information containing Confidential or Highly Confidential matter is being provided or otherwise disclosed to me pursuant to the terms and restrictions of the Confidentiality Order entered in In re Flint Water Cases, Civil Action No. 16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; (ii) that I have received and reviewed a copy of that Confidentiality Order; (iii) that I agree to be bound by the restrictions in that Confidentiality Order on the use and disclosure that may be made of Protected Material to which the order applies and by the provisions in that order regarding the return of Protected Material to which the order applies; and (iv) that I agree to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for the limited purpose of enforcing that Confidentiality Order and the agreements in this Exhibit A. I understand that a violation of the Confidentiality Order may be punishable as a contempt of court.

Dated: _______________________ Signature: ______________________________ Printed Name: ______________________________ Address: ______________________________ Telephone: ______________________________ E-Mail: ______________________________

EXHIBIT B

On behalf of _______________________________________ [NAME OF ORGANIZATION], I, ______________________________ [NAME OF INDIVIDUAL] certify (i) that certain documents, other materials, and information containing Confidential or Highly Confidential matter is being provided or otherwise disclosed by me or by the organization I represent in response to a subpoena or other discovery requests by a party to In re Flint Water Cases, Civil Action No. 16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; (ii) that I have received and reviewed a copy of the Confidentiality Order that has been entered in that litigation; (iii) that I wish to obtain the protection of that order for confidential material I or my organization are disclosing; (iv) that in return for obtaining such protection I agree on my own behalf and on behalf of the above-named organization to be bound by the provisions of that Confidentiality Order insofar as they apply to non-parties to the litigation; and (v) that I agree to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for the limited purpose of enforcing that Confidentiality Order and the agreements in this Exhibit B. I understand that a violation of the Confidentiality Order may be punishable as a contempt of court.

Dated: _______________________ Signature: ______________________________ Printed Name: ______________________________ Address: ______________________________ Telephone: ______________________________ E-Mail: ______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Flint Water Cases Case No.: 5:16-cv-10444 HON. JUDITH E. LEVY MAG. MONA K. MAJZOUB

ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER RELATED TO PRODUCTION OF MEDICAL, EDUCATIONAL, INSURANCE, EMPLOYMENT AND GOVERNMENTAL RECORDS OF PLAINTIFFS

WHEREAS this Court entered a Confidentiality Order on December 19, 2017, Dkt. No. 299 ("Confidentiality Order"), which governs the permitted use and manner of dissemination of Confidential Material, as defined in that order;

WHEREAS the Confidentiality Order envisions the production of Confidential Material by parties and nonparties that may be designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only", with the restrictions of use as further delineated in the Confidentiality Order;

WHEREAS both the "Confidential" and "Highly Confidential — Attorneys Eyes Only" designations in the Confidentiality Order envision that Confidential Material designated under either such category shall be available to all parties (or their counsel) in any Federal Flint Water Case or State Flint Water Case;

WHEREAS it is appropriate to restrict the distribution of some highly personal Confidential Materials that are medical, educational, insurance, employment or governmental records related to individual plaintiffs (hereinafter, "Plaintiffs' Records") more narrowly;

WHEREAS the parties further envision that a contractor will be retained by counsel for Defendants in various Federal and State Flint Water Cases to manage the gathering of Plaintiffs' Records in the discovery process and will assist in restricting distribution of Plaintiffs' Records (hereinafter "Defendants' Contractor for Plaintiffs' Records");

WHEREAS the Court has found based upon the submissions of the parties and its own experience, and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and E.D. Mich. L.R. 26.4, that there is good cause for entry of this addendum to the Confidentiality Order, hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. Application to Plaintiffs' Records.

This Addendum shall apply to Plaintiffs' Records and allows a more narrow distribution of Plaintiffs' Records than the distribution of Confidential Materials that is permissible in the Confidentiality Order.

2. Restricted Distribution Designation.

Any Plaintiff may elect to opt for a more narrow distribution of their Plaintiffs' Records by applying, or requesting that the Defendants' Contractor for Plaintiffs' Records apply, a "Restricted Distribution" designation to such Plaintiffs' Records in advance of their distribution. The "Restricted Distribution" legend shall be placed, to the extent practical, on each page of the document so as not to obscure any information contained in the document and close to any Bates number assigned to the document.

3. Dissemination of Restricted Distribution Materials.

If a "Restricted Distribution" designation has been applied to Plaintiffs' Records, the parties (or their counsel) eligible to receive the documents shall be as set forth in the Confidentiality Order, except that only those Defendants (or their counsel) who are named as Defendants in any state or federal action brought by the Plaintiff who has requested the Restricted Distribution shall be entitled to receive the Plaintiffs' Records. Distribution of Plaintiffs' Records to plaintiffs shall remain as set forth under the current Confidentiality Order.

4. Confidentiality Designation.

To the extent that a Defendant obtains Plaintiffs' Records from a third party in discovery pursuant to a records authorization executed by a plaintiff, then either the producing third party or the Defendants' Contractor for Plaintiffs' Records shall also designate the records as "Confidential" in the manner set forth in paragraph 8 of the Confidentiality Order, prior to dissemination of the Plaintiffs' Records.

5. Continued Application of the Confidentiality Order.

With the exception of the heightened restrictions set forth in this Addendum, the provisions of the Confidentiality Order shall continue to apply to Plaintiffs' Records.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2019 s/ Judith E. Levy JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge

FootNotes


1. McLaren Regional Medical Center ("MRMC") reserves the right to object to the entry of a complementary order in any state court case against MRMC in which it is alleged that individuals contracted Legionnaires Disease at McLaren Flint Hospital after April 2014. All parties to cases in other venues, including state courts, the Michigan Court of Claims, and the Burgess, et al. v. United States, Case
2. Counsel in Burgess and Thomas, who presently are counsel in various Flint Water Cases before this Court, have represented to this Court that upon a ruling on jurisdictional motions before the Honorable Linda V. Parker, they will endeavor to obtain a complementary discovery coordination order for those cases.
3. The Honorable Richard B. Yuille entered a complementary discovery coordination order on October 1, 2018, in In re Flint Water Litigation, Case No. 17-108646-NQ.
4. Defendants who file an answer after April 30, 2019, may individually serve ten (10) interrogatories on each named plaintiff.
5. The Court ruled on July 2, 2018, over the objections of Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel, that counsel for the putative class shall not be permitted to examine witnesses or otherwise participate in the depositions of individual plaintiffs.
6. As of September 25, 2019, the executive committee for defendants is (1) Philip Erickson (perickson@plunkettcooney.com) for LAN Defendants, (2) Alaina Devine (adevine@campbell-trial-lawyers.com) for VNA Defendants, (3) Charles Barbieri (cbarbieri@fosterswift.com) for MDEQ Defendants, (4) William Young Kim
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer