ZIKRI v. TRANSAMERICA PREMIER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 5:16-cv-02259-R (KKx). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170825d44
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT MANUEL L. REAL , District Judge . The motion of Defendant Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Company ("Defendant") for summary judgment against Plaintiff Murad Zikri, Ph.D. ("Plaintiff") was filed on May 1, 2017 and, having been thoroughly briefed by both parties, was taken under submission on May 31, 2017 by the Honorable Manuel L. Real, district judge presiding. After fully considering the moving, opposition and reply papers and all other evidence and matters presented to the C
Summary: JUDGMENT MANUEL L. REAL , District Judge . The motion of Defendant Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Company ("Defendant") for summary judgment against Plaintiff Murad Zikri, Ph.D. ("Plaintiff") was filed on May 1, 2017 and, having been thoroughly briefed by both parties, was taken under submission on May 31, 2017 by the Honorable Manuel L. Real, district judge presiding. After fully considering the moving, opposition and reply papers and all other evidence and matters presented to the Co..
More
JUDGMENT
MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge.
The motion of Defendant Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Company ("Defendant") for summary judgment against Plaintiff Murad Zikri, Ph.D. ("Plaintiff") was filed on May 1, 2017 and, having been thoroughly briefed by both parties, was taken under submission on May 31, 2017 by the Honorable Manuel L. Real, district judge presiding.
After fully considering the moving, opposition and reply papers and all other evidence and matters presented to the Court, and for good cause appearing, this Court ruled on August 1, 2017 that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact with respect to the Plaintiff's claims for (1) Breach of Contract [Settlement Agreement] (First Claim for Relief), (2) Breach of Contract [Insurance Contract] (Second Claim for Relief) and (3) Declaratory Relief (Third Claim for Relief). See Dkt. No. 45. Therefore, Defendant is entitled to judgment thereon as a matter of law.
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that Defendant shall recover its costs.
Source: Leagle
