Filed: Jun. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2017
Summary: FOURTH STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ORDER [Local Rule 144(b)] ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff RACHEL BRYANT ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CAFE RIO, INC. and RIVER PARK PROPERTIES, III ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 144(b), hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint be ex
Summary: FOURTH STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ORDER [Local Rule 144(b)] ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff RACHEL BRYANT ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CAFE RIO, INC. and RIVER PARK PROPERTIES, III ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 144(b), hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint be ext..
More
FOURTH STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ORDER
[Local Rule 144(b)]
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff RACHEL BRYANT ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CAFE RIO, INC. and RIVER PARK PROPERTIES, III ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 144(b), hereby stipulate as follows:
1. Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint be extended to July 5, 2017 pending Court approval.
2. This extension of time is Defendants' fourth extension to respond to the Complaint. Good cause exists to grant the parties' stipulation because the parties continue to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations, and wish to fully explore and exhaust all settlement efforts prior to expending Court resources and incurring additional attorneys' fees and costs, and are cautiously optimistic that this extension will facilitate a settlement.
3. This extension will not affect the Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for July 25, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may have to and including July 5, 2017 within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
Absent extraordinary circumstances, additional requests for extensions of time to file a responsive pleading are unlikely to be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
