Gutierrez v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-02068-RFB-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190104b79
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Within 14 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have: 1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2), 2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and 3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate judge, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(8). The discussi
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Within 14 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have: 1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2), 2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and 3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate judge, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(8). The discussio..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Within 14 days of the issuance of this order, the parties shall file a joint certification that they have:
1. discussed the potential for settling this matter, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2),
2. discussed the potential for utilizing alternative dispute resolution, including mediation or arbitration, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(7), and
3. discussed consenting to resolution of this case by a magistrate judge, cf. Local Rule 26-1(b)(8).
The discussion must be conducted by attorneys of record (not staff) and the joint certification must specify the attorneys who participated in the discussion. The discussion must be telephonic, in-person, or by video, and the joint certification must specify the means of discussion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
