Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ASBERRY v. CATE, 2:11-cv-2462 KJM KJN P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140829s17 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 21, 2014, the undersigned recommended that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 178.) On August 25, 2014, plaintiff filed a pleading stating that on July 31, 2014, he mailed his objections to the findings and recommendations to the court with a motion to review the in-house camera footage. (ECF No. 185.) On August
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 21, 2014, the undersigned recommended that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 178.) On August 25, 2014, plaintiff filed a pleading stating that on July 31, 2014, he mailed his objections to the findings and recommendations to the court with a motion to review the in-house camera footage. (ECF No. 185.)

On August 4, 2014, the court received plaintiff's motion for the court to review the in-house camera footage. (ECF No. 182.) On August 4, 2014, the court also received plaintiff's motion for clarifications and/or corrections. (ECF No. 183.) The court has not received from plaintiff a pleading labeled as objections to the findings and recommendations filed July 21, 2014.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file his objections to the July 21, 2014 findings and recommendations or clarify that one of the pleadings listed above is meant to be his objections.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer