Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TORRENCE v. HSEUH, 2:10-cv-01222 KJN. (2011)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20110930c13 Visitors: 25
Filed: Sep. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2011
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants' counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff DEAVON E. TORRENCE (K-65602) via videoconference. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference (dkt. no. 61) is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants' counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff DEAVON E. TORRENCE (K-65602) via videoconference.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference (dkt. no. 61) is GRANTED. 2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer