STEWART v. LIZARRAGA, CV 15-1502-AB (KES). (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160108e23
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the fi
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the fin..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle