Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEDMAN v. FOROUZANFAR, 1:16-cv-0799-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170324c71 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , District Judge . The parties agree this matter has been settled and that it may be dismissed. (Docs. 24, 25) Once a notice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as dictated by Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORD
More

ORDER CLOSING CASE

The parties agree this matter has been settled and that it may be dismissed. (Docs. 24, 25) Once a notice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as dictated by Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer