Martinez v. W. L. Montgomery, CV 16-2396-RGK (AGR). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191114662
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recomm
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recomme..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
