Bradford v. Kvichko, 1:16-cv-01077-AWI-SAB (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180731734
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND [ECF Nos. 20] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint to add additional claims. (ECF No. 20.) The deadline for filing an opposition or notice of non-opposition to that motion has passed, and none was filed. Local Rul
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND [ECF Nos. 20] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint to add additional claims. (ECF No. 20.) The deadline for filing an opposition or notice of non-opposition to that motion has passed, and none was filed. Local Rule..
More
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
[ECF Nos. 20]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint to add additional claims. (ECF No. 20.) The deadline for filing an opposition or notice of non-opposition to that motion has passed, and none was filed. Local Rule 230(l). The Court finds it appropriate to require a response to the motion.
Accordingly, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff shall have seven (7) days from the filing of the response to file a reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
