U.S. v. KATAKIS, 2:11-CR-511-05 WBS. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130314a87
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2014
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Trial WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant W. Theodore Longley was found not guilty of Count One, conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, section 1 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and not guilty of Count Two, conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of section 1349 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Both charges were contained in the Superseding Indictment. Doc. 136. Therefore, the United States m
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Trial WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant W. Theodore Longley was found not guilty of Count One, conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, section 1 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and not guilty of Count Two, conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of section 1349 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Both charges were contained in the Superseding Indictment. Doc. 136. Therefore, the United States mo..
More
UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Trial
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Defendant W. Theodore Longley was found not guilty of Count One, conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, section 1 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and not guilty of Count Two, conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of section 1349 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Both charges were contained in the Superseding Indictment. Doc. 136. Therefore, the United States moves to dismiss the charges against defendant W. Theodore Longley contained in the underlying Indictment. Doc. 1.
Respectfully submitted,
Anna Tryon Pletcher
Tai S. Milder
May Lee Heye
Kelsey C. Linnett
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
ORDER
For the reasons stated above, the charges in the underlying Indictment against defendant W. Theodore Longley are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
