Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES v. GEORGIE BEAUTY, LLC, CV13-7515 MMM (MANx). (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20150304966 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION MARGARET M. MORROW , District Judge . Based upon the Stipulation signed by counsel for Plaintiff American International Industries, Inc., ("AII") and counsel for Defendant Georgie Beauty, LLC ("Georgie Beauty") for a Final Judgment in this action, the Court enters this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendant from infringing Plaintiff's intellectual property, including the federally registered WINKS tradem
More

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Based upon the Stipulation signed by counsel for Plaintiff American International Industries, Inc., ("AII") and counsel for Defendant Georgie Beauty, LLC ("Georgie Beauty") for a Final Judgment in this action, the Court enters this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendant from infringing Plaintiff's intellectual property, including the federally registered WINKS trademark, U.S. Reg. No. 3,247,268 (the "Winks Trademark"), as part of a comprehensive settlement.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff American International Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is denied as moot.

2. Defendant Georgie Beauty, LLC, their owners, officers, agents, servants, employees, and all those in active concert or participation with any of them, are permanently restrained and enjoined from doing any of the following anywhere in the world:

a. Acquiring, purchasing, manufacturing, marketing, storing, transporting, distributing, dealing in, hypothecating, offering for sale or selling, directly or indirectly, of any beauty product, materials or packaging therefor, including but not limited to artificial eyelash products, that bears the Winks Trademark used for personal care products, where the Winks Trademark is valid. b. Using or otherwise infringing the Winks Trademark. c. Causing, directing, soliciting, assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in the above paragraphs (a) & (b).

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement of the Parties and the Permanent Injunction in this Judgment.

4. All claims are dismissed with prejudice.

5. Final Judgment is hereby entered, with each party responsible for its own costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer