Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield, 1:16-cv-0699-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180424806
Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING A JOINT STATUS REPORT JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court has learned that the criminal trial (Case No.: BF160536) for the plaintiff has concluded with a guilty finding on one charge and a mistrial on the others. Then, on March 29, 2018, Mr. Fajardo plead guilty to one charge and other charges were dismissed. 1 Thus, no later than May 4, 2018, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing whether the stay should be lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING A JOINT STATUS REPORT JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court has learned that the criminal trial (Case No.: BF160536) for the plaintiff has concluded with a guilty finding on one charge and a mistrial on the others. Then, on March 29, 2018, Mr. Fajardo plead guilty to one charge and other charges were dismissed. 1 Thus, no later than May 4, 2018, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing whether the stay should be lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes ..
More
ORDER REQUIRING A JOINT STATUS REPORT
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has learned that the criminal trial (Case No.: BF160536) for the plaintiff has concluded with a guilty finding on one charge and a mistrial on the others. Then, on March 29, 2018, Mr. Fajardo plead guilty to one charge and other charges were dismissed.1 Thus, no later than May 4, 2018, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing whether the stay should be lifted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The court may take notice of facts that are capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b); United States v. Bernal-Obeso, 989 F.2d 331, 333 (9th Cir. 1993). The record of state court proceeding is a source whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Mullis v. United States Bank. Ct., 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 n.9 (9th Cir. 1987); Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626, 635 n. 1 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.); see also Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Coil, 887 F.2d 1236, 1239 (4th Cir. 1989); Rodic v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc., 615 F.2d 736, 738 (6th. Cir. 1980).
Source: Leagle
