United States v. Berumen, 2:10-CR-00044-WBS. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200106543
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT/DENY HEARING; ORDER STIPULATION WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Defendant William Thomas Berumen, by and through his counsel of record, and plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for an admit/deny hearing on January 6, 2020. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the admit/deny hearing until January 21, 2020. 3. The
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT/DENY HEARING; ORDER STIPULATION WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Defendant William Thomas Berumen, by and through his counsel of record, and plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for an admit/deny hearing on January 6, 2020. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the admit/deny hearing until January 21, 2020. 3. The ..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT/DENY HEARING; ORDER
STIPULATION
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Defendant William Thomas Berumen, by and through his counsel of record, and plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for an admit/deny hearing on January 6, 2020.
2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the admit/deny hearing until January 21, 2020.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) Counsel for the defendant desires additional time to discuss and negotiate a potential disposition in this matter with the assigned Probation Officer.
b) The government does not object to the continuance.
c) The provisions of the Speedy Trial Act are inapplicable because this matter is before the Court due to the defendant's violation of the terms of his supervised release.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 3, 2020 /s/ WILLIAM BONHAM
WILLIAM BONHAM
Counsel for Defendant
WILLIAM THOMAS
BERUMEN
Dated: January 3, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
/s/ SAM STEFANKI
SAM STEFANKI
Assistant United States Attorney
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
