Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 1:13-CV-01574 AWI SKO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140422830 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2014
Summary: CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DEADLINES AND ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange ("Defendant"), through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby respectfully request a continuance of the joint scheduling conference and accompanying deadlines. On September 30, 2013, the EEOC filed the instant action pursuant to Title
More

CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DEADLINES AND ORDER

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange ("Defendant"), through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby respectfully request a continuance of the joint scheduling conference and accompanying deadlines.

On September 30, 2013, the EEOC filed the instant action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action on January 28, 2014. The EEOC filed its opposition to Defendant's motion on February 24, 2014 and Defendant replied on March 3, 2014. On March 4, 2014, the Court took the matter under submission. (Docket No. 18).

A. Good Cause to Extend Deadline for Submission of Proposed Protective Order

The motion to dismiss is still under submission with the Court. The resolution of the motion to dismiss is necessary for the parties to productively proceed with the Rule 26(f) conference and the joint scheduling conference.

B. Stipulation to Extend Deadlines

As such, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the joint scheduling conference and attendant deadlines be amended as follows:

1. The joint scheduling conference shall be held on July 8, 2014.

2. The parties shall submit a joint scheduling report to the Court no later than July 1, 2014.

3. The parties shall conduct their Rule 26(f) conference no later than June 18, 2014.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, THIS COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT,

The initial scheduling conference shall be continued to July 8, 2014. The parties shall conduct their Rule 26(f) conference no later than June 18, 2014, and their joint scheduling report shall be due on July 1, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer