Washington v. Rashid, 2:17-cv-01934-TLN-CKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180824c56
Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . On May 4, 2018, the remaining Defendants filed a motion asking that this Court treat the magistrate judge's January 26, 2018 "screening order" as a "report and recommendation." In the motion, Defendants assert that in the "screening order" the magistrate judge "dismissed certain Defendants from this action." (ECF No. 19 at 2.) However, a review of the docket reveals that, the magistrate judge did not dismiss any Defendants on January 26, 2018. Rather,
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . On May 4, 2018, the remaining Defendants filed a motion asking that this Court treat the magistrate judge's January 26, 2018 "screening order" as a "report and recommendation." In the motion, Defendants assert that in the "screening order" the magistrate judge "dismissed certain Defendants from this action." (ECF No. 19 at 2.) However, a review of the docket reveals that, the magistrate judge did not dismiss any Defendants on January 26, 2018. Rather, ..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
On May 4, 2018, the remaining Defendants filed a motion asking that this Court treat the magistrate judge's January 26, 2018 "screening order" as a "report and recommendation." In the motion, Defendants assert that in the "screening order" the magistrate judge "dismissed certain Defendants from this action." (ECF No. 19 at 2.) However, a review of the docket reveals that, the magistrate judge did not dismiss any Defendants on January 26, 2018. Rather, she recommended "that all [D]efendants other than Rashid, Willick, Gonzalez and Jones be dismissed." That recommendation was adopted by Judge Garland Burrell on February 12, 2018.
Accordingly, Defendants' May 4, 2018 Request for Ruling is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
