SIDOROV v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:17-cv-00002-KJM-DB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170622a52
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On February 28, 2017, Transamerica Life Insurance Company ("Transamerica") moved to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 7. After the court adopted the parties' stipulation to give plaintiff Yegeniy V. Sidorov until March 31 to oppose the motion, ECF No. 13, Sidorov filed neither an opposition nor a notice of non-opposition, as required by Local Rule 230(c). Instead, on April 7, 2017, Sidorov filed a motion to amend the complaint. ECF No
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On February 28, 2017, Transamerica Life Insurance Company ("Transamerica") moved to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 7. After the court adopted the parties' stipulation to give plaintiff Yegeniy V. Sidorov until March 31 to oppose the motion, ECF No. 13, Sidorov filed neither an opposition nor a notice of non-opposition, as required by Local Rule 230(c). Instead, on April 7, 2017, Sidorov filed a motion to amend the complaint. ECF No...
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On February 28, 2017, Transamerica Life Insurance Company ("Transamerica") moved to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 7. After the court adopted the parties' stipulation to give plaintiff Yegeniy V. Sidorov until March 31 to oppose the motion, ECF No. 13, Sidorov filed neither an opposition nor a notice of non-opposition, as required by Local Rule 230(c). Instead, on April 7, 2017, Sidorov filed a motion to amend the complaint. ECF No. 14. Sidorov's motion did not include a proposed amended complaint, as required by Local Rule 137(c). Sidorov's reply ultimately included a proposed amended complaint, ECF No. 23, but the reply was untimely as it was filed four days before hearing, in violation of Local Rule 230(d).
Accordingly, as discussed with counsel at the initial hearing on the motion to dismiss, counsel for Sidorov is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be issued in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with the Local Rules.1 A response, if any, shall be filed within seven (7) days of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The court is aware of plaintiff's counsel's request for relief from the court's previous order to show cause, and will address that relief in its ultimate disposition of the defense motion to dismiss and plaintiff's pending motion to amend.
Source: Leagle
