Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McENTEE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 1:17-cv-01116-AWI-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170915886 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER ON THE JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 7) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 12, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation for an extension of thirty days for Ford Motor Company to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint, indicating the defendant's response would be due October 13, 2017. (Doc. 7 at 2) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulation to an extension of time "no more than twenty-eigh
More

ORDER ON THE JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(Doc. 7)

On September 12, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation for an extension of thirty days for Ford Motor Company to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint, indicating the defendant's response would be due October 13, 2017. (Doc. 7 at 2) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulation to an extension of time "no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a complaint . . . without approval of the Court if the extension is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared in the action and are affected by the stipulation." Any further extensions "must be approved by the Court." Id.

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the defendant SHALL file a response to the complaint no later than October 13, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer