Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc., 17-cv-05934-YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180223b60
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PERMIT PRIOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY Re: Dkt.Nos. 39, 40. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Two motions are now before this Court, namely plaintiff's motions (i) to permit plaintiff's prior incorporation by reference into its opposition in this case of its opposition to the omnibus motion to dismiss in related cases for which proceedings have been consolidated; and (ii) for leave to file a sur-reply
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PERMIT PRIOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY Re: Dkt.Nos. 39, 40. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Two motions are now before this Court, namely plaintiff's motions (i) to permit plaintiff's prior incorporation by reference into its opposition in this case of its opposition to the omnibus motion to dismiss in related cases for which proceedings have been consolidated; and (ii) for leave to file a sur-reply ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PERMIT PRIOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
Re: Dkt.Nos. 39, 40.
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Two motions are now before this Court, namely plaintiff's motions (i) to permit plaintiff's prior incorporation by reference into its opposition in this case of its opposition to the omnibus motion to dismiss in related cases for which proceedings have been consolidated; and (ii) for leave to file a sur-reply regarding the Rule 12(c) motion of defendant Garmin International, Inc., et al. (Dkt. Nos. 39 and 40.) Having considered plaintiff's motions and the proceedings in this matter, the Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to permit plaintiff's prior incorporation by reference into its opposition in this case of its opposition to the omnibus motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 39) and DENIES plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply. (Dkt. No. 40.)
This terminates Dkt. Nos. 39 and 40.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
