Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Manheimer v. Trufusion Yoga, LLC, 2:16-cv-02186-JCM-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190416936 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Seth Manheimer and Defendants TruFusion Yoga, LLC, TruFusion, LLC, TruFusion Franchising LLC, Michael Borden, and Martin Hinton hereby enter into the following Stipulation based on the following facts: RECITALS A. Defendants filed on March 8, 2019 Defendants' Motion For Entry Of Judgment On Jury Verdict And For Judgment As
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Seth Manheimer and Defendants TruFusion Yoga, LLC, TruFusion, LLC, TruFusion Franchising LLC, Michael Borden, and Martin Hinton hereby enter into the following Stipulation based on the following facts:

RECITALS

A. Defendants filed on March 8, 2019 Defendants' Motion For Entry Of Judgment On Jury Verdict And For Judgment As A Matter Of Law (the "Motion"). B. Plaintiff filed on March 22, 2019 a Response to the Motion. C. Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response to the Motion is due on March 29. D. Due to the press of other business and personal matters, counsel for the Defendants has requested an extension a one week extension to Reply to the Response, and the Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to that request.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion shall be extended from March 29, 2019 to April 5, 2019.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer