Boconvi v. Velocity Express, LLC, 3:17-cv-02623-JST. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170710895
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On July 6, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs from August 17, 2017, to September 21, 2017. Following a short meet-and-confer regarding the current briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' Motion, the Parties agreed to the following amended briefing deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs: Original Date
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On July 6, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs from August 17, 2017, to September 21, 2017. Following a short meet-and-confer regarding the current briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' Motion, the Parties agreed to the following amended briefing deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs: Original Date ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
On July 6, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs from August 17, 2017, to September 21, 2017. Following a short meet-and-confer regarding the current briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' Motion, the Parties agreed to the following amended briefing deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs:
Original Date New Date
Plaintiffs' Motion July 14, 2017 August 2, 2017
Defendants' Opposition July 31, 2017 August 18, 2017
Plaintiffs' Reply August 7, 2017 August 25, 2017
Under the original briefing schedule, Plaintiffs' Motion was to be fully briefed 10 days prior to the hearing date. Under the new briefing schedule, briefing will conclude 25 days prior to the hearing date. The amended schedule will not prejudice either party and no other extension has been requested.
SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
I, Jacob Rusch, declare under penalty of perjury and pursuant to the laws of California and the United States that I have in my possession e-mail correspondence from Byung-Kwan Park that the content of this Joint Stipulation is acceptable to all persons required to sign it.
/s/Jacob R. Rusch
Jacob R. Rusch
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
Source: Leagle
