Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WOODS v. CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 2:17-cv-793 GEB AC PS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170809810 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been referred to the magistrate by E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested a 51-day extension of time to respond to the defendant's Motion To Dismiss. ECF No. 26. For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing on the Motion To Dismiss (ECF Nos. 21, 23), currently set for August 23, 2017, is CONTINUED to October 11, 2017 at 10:0
More

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been referred to the magistrate by E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 302(c)(21).

Plaintiff has requested a 51-day extension of time to respond to the defendant's Motion To Dismiss. ECF No. 26.

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing on the Motion To Dismiss (ECF Nos. 21, 23), currently set for August 23, 2017, is CONTINUED to October 11, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall comply with the briefing schedule set forth at Local Rule 230.

2. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, currently set for October 11, 2017, is CONTINUED to February 21, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file status reports in accordance with the Order Setting Status Conference, ECF No. 4 ¶ 5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer