Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., 5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140821949 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. ("Defendant," together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant in Santa Clara Superior Court; WHEREAS, on July 17, 2014, Defendant removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern
More

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE SCHEDULING

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. ("Defendant," together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendant in Santa Clara Superior Court;

WHEREAS, on July 17, 2014, Defendant removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division;

WHEREAS, on July 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a special motion to strike ("Motions") in response to the Complaint with an agreed-upon hearing date of September 19, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Court entered the Parties' stipulation and proposed order extending the deadlines for the Oppositions and Replies;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff intends to amend the complaint;

WHEREAS, because Plaintiff is amending the complaint, it would be a waste of party and judicial resources for the parties to continue briefing and for the Court to hear the pending Motions;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Court should find that good cause exists to enter an order that:

1. Defendant's Motions shall be withdrawn without prejudice and the Motions shall be taken off calendar;

2. Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint no later than August 29, 2014;

3. Plaintiff's amended complaint will not add any new parties or claims; and

4. The Parties shall agree on an appropriate deadline for Defendant to file its motions or other pleadings in response to the amended complaint and an appropriate briefing schedule should Defendant file any motions in response to the amended complaint.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer