Meister v. Saul, Case 2:18-cv-02779-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190718848
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SETTLEMENT REQUEST ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 61 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. With this extension: • Defendant shall serve and file a responsive brief on or before September
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SETTLEMENT REQUEST ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 61 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. With this extension: • Defendant shall serve and file a responsive brief on or before September ..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SETTLEMENT REQUEST
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 61 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. With this extension:
• Defendant shall serve and file a responsive brief on or before September 16, 2019; and
• Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within 21 days of service of defendant's responsive brief (on or before October 7, 2019).
Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed to respond to the motion due to undersigned counsel's workload, including 7 district court briefs due in July and 14 district court briefs due in August. In addition, counsel will be on leave from July 19 through July 30.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: July 16, 2019 ______________*
(*as authorized via e-mail on 7/16/19)
GERI KAHN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: July 16, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: _____________
MARCELO ILLARMO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g)(action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security).
Source: Leagle
