Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO UNSEAL CASE AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION The above-captioned matter is set for a status conference on September 10, 2019. For the following reasons, the parties now stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue the attached proposed order unsealing the matter. As reason therefore, the parties state that this matter originated in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case Number 6:18-cr-280-Or
Summary: STIPULATION TO UNSEAL CASE AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION The above-captioned matter is set for a status conference on September 10, 2019. For the following reasons, the parties now stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue the attached proposed order unsealing the matter. As reason therefore, the parties state that this matter originated in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case Number 6:18-cr-280-Orl..
More
STIPULATION TO UNSEAL CASE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION
The above-captioned matter is set for a status conference on September 10, 2019. For the following reasons, the parties now stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue the attached proposed order unsealing the matter.
As reason therefore, the parties state that this matter originated in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case Number 6:18-cr-280-Orl-40DCI. At the time it was indicted, the matter was sealed. After arrests of the above two defendants had been made in the matter in the Northern District of California, see Docket No. 19-MJ-70097 (related Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5 proceeding), it was unsealed. Nonetheless, when the Middle District of Florida matter was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 20, it was transferred as a sealed case.
There is no need for the matter to be sealed at this time. Unsealing the matter will facilitate the prompt and just adjudication of this matter and is therefore appropriate.
Accordingly, the parties agree that the matter should be unsealed pursuant to the proposed order below or whatever other order that the Court deems appropriate.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 3, 2019 DAVID L. ANDERSON
United States Attorney
________
NICHOLAS J. WALSH
Assistant United States Attorney
ALEXANDRA J. SHEPARD
Special Assistant United States Attorney
DATED: September 3, 2019
________
DOUGLAS I. HORNGRAD
SAMUEL B. O'KEEFE
Attorneys for Defendant
RYAN KEVIN JOYCE
DATED: September 3, 2019
________
JAMES A. BUSTAMANTE
Attorney for Defendant
AUSTIN TAYLOR MATTOS
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that this matter, N.D. Cal. Docket No. 19-CR-00375 RS, and the related Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5 proceeding, N.D. Cal. Docket No. 19-MJ-70097, be unsealed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
