Benyamini v. Terry, 2:15-cv-02615-TLN-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180213578
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 27, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recomme
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 27, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommen..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 27, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2017, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's "motion seeking an emerg[e]ncy continuance of said matters until[] further notice," construed as a motion to stay (ECF No. 39), is denied.
Source: Leagle
