Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MENDOZA v. ZAMBRANO, 4:16-cv-06455-KAW. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170828773 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2017
Summary: SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 38 Re: Dkt. No. 38 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Anthony Mendoza, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit alleging wage and hour violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, in which he alleges disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Dkt. No. 36.) On July 26, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Dkt. No.
More

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 38

Re: Dkt. No. 38

Plaintiff Anthony Mendoza, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit alleging wage and hour violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, in which he alleges disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Dkt. No. 36.) On July 26, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 38.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, with an additional three days for mailing, Plaintiff's opposition was due on August 14, 2017. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.

Accordingly, by no later than September 5, 2017, the Court orders Plaintiff to (1) file a response to this order to show cause and explain why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and (2) file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. The response to this order to show cause and the opposition should be filed as separate documents. To aid in his compliance with this order, Plaintiff may wish to contact the Federal Pro Bono Project's Help Desk—a free service for pro se litigants— by calling (415) 782-8982 to make an appointment to obtain legal assistance from a licensed attorney.

Failure to timely respond to this order to show cause may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order ¶ 22 ("The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion").

Should Plaintiff timely file an opposition, Defendants are permitted to file their reply on or before September 12, 2017. The October 5, 2017 hearing remains on calendar as scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer