CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
To the Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States District Judge: The special master respectfully submits the following Report and Recommendation.
On March 14, 2013, the special master heard motions by Tessera to extend certain scheduled dates. At the conclusion of the hearing, the parties were given time to meet and confer regarding scheduling, and they proposed a revised schedule to the special master on March 22.
Their proposed schedule includes postponing the present trial date from April 7, 2014 to August 25, 2014, as well as making other included changes in the schedule. It is important to note that their proposed schedule is agreed upon by all of the parties to these cases except Qualcomm. The agreement of some of the defendants is conditional upon the special master recommending
The special master concludes that some modifications to the present schedule are necessary, because of: (1) an extremely large volume of discovery that was produced on the last day for the completion of discovery; (2) late and voluminous changes to certain discovery information previously submitted; (3) the necessity for adequate time for the experts' testing and work between the opening reports and the rebuttal reports; and (4) extreme time pressure on the court-appointed expert.
For the Court's convenience, the calendar of the current schedule and the proposed changes are set forth in Exhibit A to this Report and Recommendation.
Because the proposed schedule would include changes in the trial date and other hearings before Your Honor, the special master has no authority to order such changes. And the special master does not know what impact the changes might have on Your Honor's overall calendar.
The special master does recommend the proposed schedule set forth in Exhibit B, but of course subject to Your Honor's concurrence. If Your Honor does approve, the following Interim Order is moot.
Because other scheduled dates, primarily the preparation of expert reports, are imminent, and because Your Honor may take some time before ruling upon the above recommendation or may deny the recommendation, Tessera requests that some interim dates, not impacting the trial date or court hearings, should be adjusted now for the benefit of the parties and their experts. Those proposed interim changes are opposed by defendants, primarily because of some shortening their time for the preparation of rebuttal expert reports. That concern has been reduced in the order below. And the recently submitted volume of discovery and discovery changes are such that the special master concludes that additional time should, in the interests of justice, be granted for the assimilation of that information. The special master's signature below is therefore an order adopting the following interim schedule, since it does not involve changing the trial or other scheduled court dates. This order is of course subject to review by Your Honor.
1. The deadline for Tessera's opening infringement and damages reports, including invalidity reports, shall be due on
2. Rebuttal expert reports for all parties shall be due on
3. The deadline for completing party expert depositions and Markman discovery shall be
4. The deadline for the court-appointed expert report shall be
5. The deadline for deposing the court-appointed expert shall be
6. The expert discovery cutoff shall be
7. The opening Markman and SJ briefs shall be due on September 30, 2013.
All other dates in the current schedule remain unaffected.
This Interim Order is subject to further changes as a result of any order entered by the Honorable Claudia Wilken in response to the above Report and Recommendation.