Reno Contracting Inc. v. Mountain Health & Community Services, Inc., 18cv00238 BTM KSC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180214c58
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS RENO CONTRACTING, INC.'S COMPLAINT AGAINST UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND TO REMAND REMAINING CAUSES OF ACTION TO STATE COURT 37-2017-00049052-CU-BC-CTL BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ , District Judge . On February 8, 2018, Reno Contracting, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), and the United States of America ("Defendant"), filed a joint motion for an order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") and remanding the re
Summary: ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS RENO CONTRACTING, INC.'S COMPLAINT AGAINST UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND TO REMAND REMAINING CAUSES OF ACTION TO STATE COURT 37-2017-00049052-CU-BC-CTL BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ , District Judge . On February 8, 2018, Reno Contracting, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), and the United States of America ("Defendant"), filed a joint motion for an order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") and remanding the rem..
More
ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS RENO CONTRACTING, INC.'S COMPLAINT AGAINST UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND TO REMAND REMAINING CAUSES OF ACTION TO STATE COURT
37-2017-00049052-CU-BC-CTL
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
On February 8, 2018, Reno Contracting, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), and the United States of America ("Defendant"), filed a joint motion for an order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") and remanding the remainder of Plaintiff's Complaint to state court. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' joint motion. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's fifth cause of action for "Enforcement of Stop Payment Notice Foreclosure" against the USDA is dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own attorney fees and costs;
2. Defendant's ex-parte motion for an extension of time to file a response is denied as moot; and
3. The remainder of Plaintiff's Complaint is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego.
Source: Leagle
