LULE v. COLVIN, 1:15-cv-01631-JLT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160719585
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jul. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On July 14, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for a thirty-day extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; a
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On July 14, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for a thirty-day extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; an..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On July 14, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation for a thirty-day extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 13) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendant's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the opening brief no later than August 15, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
