Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund v. SOTD Corporation, C17-0518 WHO. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170502858 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 01, 2017
Latest Update: May 01, 2017
Summary: JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendant herein respectfully submit this Joint Request to Continue the Case Management Conference, currently on calendar for May 9, 2017, for approximately sixty to ninety (60-90) days. Good cause exists for the granting of the continuance, as follows: 1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed on February 1, 2017 (Dkt. #4). Thereafter, the Court issue
More

JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON

Plaintiffs and Defendant herein respectfully submit this Joint Request to Continue the Case Management Conference, currently on calendar for May 9, 2017, for approximately sixty to ninety (60-90) days. Good cause exists for the granting of the continuance, as follows:

1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed on February 1, 2017 (Dkt. #4). Thereafter, the Court issued an order (Dkt. #13) finding that this action is related to the following case: District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, et al. v. SOTD Corporation dba The Glass Man & Sons (U.S.D.C. Case No. 17-cv-00516-WHO). Defendant filed a Notice of Appearance of Counsel (Dkt. #21) on March 27, 2017, and the parties entered into a stipulation to extend Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint from March 30, 2017 to May 1, 2017 (Dkt. #22).

2. Since then, the parties have been in contact to attempt to resolve this matter without the need for further litigation, and regarding selection of an ADR Process, as required by the Court.

3. The parties entered into a second stipulation to extend Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint from May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017 which is being filed concurrently with this Joint Request to Continue. The parties believe that this additional time will assist in their attempts to resolve the matter without the need for further litigation.

4. Based on the above, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for May 9, 2017, be continued for approximately sixty to ninety (60-90) days to allow sufficient time for the parties to meet and confer regarding determine whether this matter can be resolved without the need for further litigation.

There are no issues that need to be addressed by the parties at the currently scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs, as well as the Court's time and resources, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled Case Management Conference for approximately sixty to ninety (60-90) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to August 8, 2017 at 2 p.m., and all previously set deadlines and dates related to this case are continued accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer