Pertz v. Heartland Realty Investors, Inc., 19-cv-06330-CRB (TSH). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200310a48
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2020
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 29 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . Discovery in this case has been referred to the undersigned. The Court's Discovery Standing Order states that "counsel for each party shall meet and confer in person or, if counsel are located outside the Bay Area, by telephone, to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange of letters, e-mails, telephone calls or facsimile transmissions does not satisfy the meet and confer requirement." Here, counsel ar
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 29 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . Discovery in this case has been referred to the undersigned. The Court's Discovery Standing Order states that "counsel for each party shall meet and confer in person or, if counsel are located outside the Bay Area, by telephone, to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange of letters, e-mails, telephone calls or facsimile transmissions does not satisfy the meet and confer requirement." Here, counsel are..
More
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 29
THOMAS S. HIXSON, Magistrate Judge.
Discovery in this case has been referred to the undersigned. The Court's Discovery Standing Order states that "counsel for each party shall meet and confer in person or, if counsel are located outside the Bay Area, by telephone, to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange of letters, e-mails, telephone calls or facsimile transmissions does not satisfy the meet and confer requirement." Here, counsel are from the Bay Area, so the in-person meet and confer requirement applies. Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to meet and confer in person. If they are unable to resolve their dispute, they must file a joint discovery letter brief within 14 days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
